From climate risk to the returns and volatility of energy assets and green bonds: A predictability analysis under various conditions

被引:54
作者
Bouri, Elie [1 ,5 ]
Rognone, Lavinia [2 ,6 ]
Sokhanvar, Amin [3 ]
Wang, Zhenkun [4 ]
机构
[1] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Business, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Univ Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business Sch, Manchester, England
[3] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[4] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Business, 26 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul 02447, South Korea
[6] Univ Edinburgh, Business Sch, Edinburgh EH8 9JS, Scotland
关键词
Quantile dependency and predictability; Cross-quantilogram; Physical and transition risk; Green and brown energy; Carbon emission allowances; Green bonds; European markets; DISASTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122682
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The importance of climate risk as a source of systemic risk for financial markets and the decisions of investors, portfolio managers, and regulators is growing. We examine the directional predictability from two climate risk measures, transition risk and physical risk, to the returns and volatility of European brown and green energy stocks, European carbon emission allowances, and global green bonds. Using daily data, we apply a crossquantilogram approach in a time-varying setting to measure potential differences in the predictability across quantiles and over various crisis periods. The return predictability results are more pronounced for transition risk than physical risk, especially for brown energy stocks and carbon emission allowances, and they generally vary across periods and markets conditions. The predictability of volatility is also significant at specific time periods and volatility states, especially from transition risk, and the sign of the predictability is positive for brown energy and carbon emission allowances whereas it is negative for green bonds. We show that a lower-than-expected level of discussion about the transition process leads to a heightened volatility of brown energy markets. These findings have important implications regarding climate risks assessment on return and volatility predictability and climate risk and portfolio decarbonization under COP26.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Green bonds as a bridge to the UN sustainable development goals on environment: A climate change empirical investigation [J].
Ahmed, Rizwan ;
Yusuf, Fatima ;
Ishaque, Maria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2024, 29 (02) :2428-2451
[2]   Do Fund Managers Misestimate Climatic Disaster Risk? [J].
Alok, Shashwat ;
Kumar, Nitin ;
Wermers, Russ .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 33 (03) :1146-1183
[3]  
Ardia D., 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal, P3717722, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3717722
[4]   Does Climate Change Affect Real Estate Prices? Only If You Believe In It [J].
Baldauf, Markus ;
Garlappi, Lorenzo ;
Yannelis, Constantine .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 33 (03) :1256-1295
[5]  
Bansal Ravi., 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE GROWT
[6]  
Batten S., 2016, 603 BOE
[7]   Climate risks and financial stability [J].
Battiston, Stefano ;
Dafermos, Yannis ;
Monasterolo, Irene .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2021, 54
[8]   Accounting for finance is key for climate mitigation pathways [J].
Battiston, Stefano ;
Monasterolo, Irene ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
van Ruijven, Bas J. .
SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6545) :918-920
[9]  
Beltran DO, 2023, International Finance Discussion Paper, P1, DOI [10.17016/ifdp.2023.1368, 10.17016/IFDP.2023.1368, DOI 10.17016/IFDP.2023.1368]
[10]   Disaster on the horizon: The price effect of sea level rise [J].
Bernstein, Asaf ;
Gustafson, Matthew T. ;
Lewis, Ryan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (02) :253-272