Plaque accumulation on the fitting surface of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses with contact or noncontact pontics: A split mouth randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Gong, Zhenjiang
Lin, Ye
Di, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral Implantol, 22 Zhongguancun South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
complete; denture; immediate; oral hygiene; prostheses and implants; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; EUROPEAN WORKSHOP; RISK INDICATORS; DISEASES; MAINTENANCE; MUCOSITIS; HYGIENE; REHABILITATIONS; PREVALENCE; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.13062
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the differences in plaque accumulation on the fitting surface of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses with contact or noncontact pontics. Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients (20 prostheses, 7 in the maxilla, and 13 in the mandible) intending to undergo full-arch implant-supported immediate function prostheses were recruited. During immediate restoration and using the midline as the boundary, one side was restored as a pontic and mucosa noncontact type (the test group), and the opposite side was restored as a pontic and mucosa contact type (the control group). In a follow-up 6 months after the surgery, the cleanliness of the fitting surface of the immediate prosthesis was evaluated by plaque staining and debris index determination. Patient satisfaction was investigated by questionnaire. Results: Twenty prostheses from 19 patients included in the randomized controlled trial were followed up. Among the 20 prostheses, the percentage of area covered with plaque was significantly lower in the test group compared with that in the control group (31.5 +/- 15.8% vs. 43.7 +/- 15.3%; p < 0.001). The debris index in the test group was lower than that in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (2.77 +/- 0.73 vs. 3.15 +/- 0.90; p > 0.05). In the patient satisfaction survey, most of the patients were satisfied with most aspects of the prostheses, however, nearly half of the patients were not satisfied with the cleaning. Conclusions: The pontic and mucosa noncontact prosthetic design reduces plaque accumulation on the fitting surface, which is beneficial for maintaining oral cleanliness. However, the majority of study samples were mandible and conclusions may not be fully applicable to maxilla. Trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028576). Clinical Significance: The noncontact design in full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses may be an effective measure of improving oral hygiene promotion. There is need for more research that can further improve oral hygiene of patients with full-arch implant-supported prostheses.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1084
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Full-Arch Zirconia Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses
    Al-Tarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Shonberg, David
    Fayz, Lily
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (02) : 381 - +
  • [2] Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    deLlanos-Lanchares, Hector
    Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza
    Alvarez-Riesgo, Jose-Antonio
    Llorente-Pendas, Santiago
    Herrero-Climent, Mariano
    Alvarez-Arenal, Angel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (12) : 1 - 23
  • [3] The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses
    Faverani, Leonardo Perez
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    Ramalho-Ferreira, Gabriel
    Delben, Juliana Aparecida
    Ferreira, Mayara Barbosa
    Garcia Junior, Idelmo Rangel
    Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 37 : 164 - 170
  • [4] Strain Behavior of Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by Four or Five Implants
    Sbardelotto, Cristian
    Lapria Faria, Adriana Claudia
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
    Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (01) : 153 - 158
  • [5] Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review
    AlTarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [6] Clinical evaluation of full-arch screw-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses and full-arch telescopic-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses: A 5-12 year follow-up retrospective study
    Mori, Gentaro
    Oda, Yukari
    Sakamoto, Kei
    Ito, Taichi
    Yajima, Yasutomo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) : 197 - 205
  • [7] Comparison of plaque accumulation and soft-tissue blood flow with the use of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses with mucosal surfaces of different materials: a randomized clinical study
    Kanao, Masato
    Nakamoto, Tetsuji
    Kajiwara, Norihiro
    Kondo, Yusuke
    Masaki, Chihiro
    Hosokawa, Ryuji
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (10) : 1137 - 1143
  • [8] Titanium versus zirconia complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A comparison of plaque accumulation
    Curiel-Aguilera, Francisco P.
    Grif, Garth R.
    Rossmann, Jeffrey A.
    Gonzalez, Jorge A.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (03): : 369 - 375
  • [9] A Comparison Between Fixed and Removable Mandibular Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Tsigarida, Alexandra
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 : S85 - S92
  • [10] Tooth Fractures in Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Acrylic Resin Prostheses: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Ventura, Javier
    Jimenez-Castellanos, Emilio
    Romero, Jose
    Enrile, Francisco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (02) : 161 - 165