Digitization and urban governance: The city as a reflection of its data infrastructure

被引:11
作者
Bayat, Ali [1 ]
Kawalek, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Lecturer Business Management, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Univ Loughborough, Ctr Informat Management, Sch Business & Econ, Loughborough, Leics, England
关键词
big data; citizen participation; digital-era governance; digitization; smart cities; urban governance; SMART; COPRODUCTION; INFORMATION; GOVERNMENT;
D O I
10.1177/00208523211033205
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article introduces the 'House Model', an integrated framework consisting of four data governance modes, based on the urban and smart city vision, context, and big data technologies. The model stems from engaged scholarship, synthesizing and extending the academic debates and evidence from existing smart city initiatives. It provides a means for comparing cities in terms of their digitization efforts, helps the planning of more effective urban data infrastructures and guides future empirical research in this area. The article contributes to the literature examining the issue of big data and its governance in local government and smart cities. Points for practitioners Data is a vital part of smart city initiatives. Where the data comes from, who owns it and how it is used are all important questions. Data governance is therefore important and has consequences for the overall governance of the city. The House Model presented in this article provides a means for organizing data governance. It relates questions of data governance to the history and vision of smart city initiatives, and provides a typology organizing these initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 38
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Smart Cities at the Crossroads: NEW TENSIONS IN CITY TRANSFORMATION [J].
Almirall, Esteve ;
Wareham, Jonathan ;
Ratti, Carlo ;
Conesa, Pilar ;
Bria, Francesca ;
Gaviria, Anibal ;
Edmondson, Amy .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 59 (01) :141-152
[2]  
Andersson Magnus., 2010, Culture Unbound, V2, P193, DOI DOI 10.3384/CU.2000.1525.10212193
[3]   Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and "big data' [J].
Andrews, Leighton .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 97 (02) :296-310
[4]   Smart city policies: A spatial approach [J].
Angelidou, Margarita .
CITIES, 2014, 41 :S3-S11
[5]   Collaborative Platforms as a Governance Strategy [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (01) :16-32
[6]   Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? [J].
Ansell, Christopher ;
Miura, Satoshi .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 98 (01) :261-276
[7]  
Baccarne B., 2014, INTERDISCIPLINARY ST, V3, P143, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5854-4
[8]   Digital Infrastructures and Urban Governance [J].
Barns, Sarah ;
Cosgrave, Ellie ;
Acuto, Michele ;
Mcneill, Donald .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (01) :20-31
[9]   Information governance in digitized public administration [J].
Brown, David C. G. ;
Toze, Sandra .
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2017, 60 (04) :581-604
[10]   Smartness and European urban performance: assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes [J].
Caragliu, Andrea ;
Del Bo, Chiara .
INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2012, 25 (02) :97-113