Back and front peripersonal space: behavioural and EMG evidence of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms

被引:1
作者
Cocchini, Gianna [1 ]
Muellensiefen, Daniel [1 ]
Platania, Ruggero [1 ]
Niglio, Chiara [1 ]
Tricomi, Enrica [2 ]
Veronelli, Laura [3 ,4 ]
Judica, Elda [3 ]
机构
[1] Goldsmiths Univ London, Psychol Dept, London, England
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Tech Informat ZITI, Med Tech Grp, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Casa Cura IGEA SpA, Dept Neurorehabil Sci, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
关键词
Back space; Rear space; EMG; Blink reflex; Peripersonal space; AUDITORY DISTANCE PERCEPTION; BLINK; BODY; STIMULUS; HUMANS; REFLEX; HEMINEGLECT;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-023-06740-4
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous studies have identified a 'defensive graded field' in the peripersonal front space where potential threatening stimuli induce stronger blink responses, mainly modulated by top-down mechanisms, which include various factors, such as proximity to the body, stimulus valence, and social cues. However, very little is known about the mechanisms responsible for representation of the back space and the possible role of bottom-up information. By means of acoustic stimuli, we evaluated individuals' representation for front and back space in an ambiguous environment that offered some degree of uncertainty in terms of both distance (close vs. far) and front-back egocentric location of sound sources. We aimed to consider verbal responses about localization of sound sources and EMG data on blink reflex. Results suggested that stimulus distance evaluations were better explained by subjective front-back discrimination, rather than real position. Moreover, blink response data were also better explained by subjective front-back discrimination. Taken together, these findings suggest that the mechanisms that dictate blink response magnitude might also affect sound localization (possible bottom-up mechanism), probably interacting with top-down mechanisms that modulate stimuli location and distance. These findings are interpreted within the defensive peripersonal framework, suggesting a close relationship between bottom-up and top-down mechanisms on spatial representation.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 255
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Auditory distance perception in front and rear space [J].
Aggius-Vella, Elena ;
Gori, Monica ;
Campus, Claudio ;
Moore, Brian C. J. ;
Pardhan, Shahina ;
Kolarik, Andrew J. ;
Van der Stoep, Nathan .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 417
[2]   Non-spatial skills differ in the front and rear peri-personal space [J].
Aggius-Vella, Elena ;
Gori, Monica ;
Animali, Silvia ;
Campus, Claudio ;
Binda, Paola .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 147
[3]   Comparison of auditory spatial bisection and minimum audible angle in front, lateral, and back space [J].
Aggius-Vella, Elena ;
Kolarik, Andrew J. ;
Gori, Monica ;
Cirstea, Silvia ;
Campus, Claudio ;
Moore, Brian C. J. ;
Pardhan, Shahina .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[4]   The Role of Visual Experience in Auditory Space Perception around the Legs [J].
Aggius-Vella, Elena ;
Campus, Claudio ;
Kolarik, Andrew Joseph ;
Gori, Monica .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[5]   Different audio spatial metric representation around the body [J].
Aggius-Vella, Elena ;
Campus, Claudio ;
Gori, Monica .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
[6]   Working memory and vigilance: Evidence from normal aging and Alzheimer's disease [J].
Baddeley, A ;
Cocchini, G ;
Della Sala, S ;
Logie, RH ;
Spinnler, H .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1999, 41 (01) :87-108
[7]   Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J].
Barr, Dale J. ;
Levy, Roger ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Tily, Harry J. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) :255-278
[8]  
Berg W.K., 1999, STARTLE MODIFICATION, P21, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511665523.004
[9]   Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies [J].
Blumenthal, TD ;
Cuthbert, BN ;
Filion, DL ;
Hackley, S ;
Lipp, OV ;
Van Boxtel, A .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) :1-15
[10]   Inhibition of the human startle response is affected by both prepulse intensity and eliciting stimulus intensity [J].
Blumenthal, TD .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 44 (02) :85-104