Complication Profiles of Smooth vs Textured Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:3
作者
Fijany, Arman J. [1 ,8 ]
Chaker, Sara C. [2 ]
Hung, Ya-Ching [1 ]
Zago, Ilana [3 ]
Friedlich, Nicole [3 ]
Olsson, Sofia E. [3 ]
Holan, Cole A. [4 ]
Montorfano, Lisandro [1 ]
Mubang, Ronnie N. [1 ]
Givechian, Kevin B. [5 ]
Boctor, Michael J. [6 ]
Pekarev, Maxim
Martinez-Jorge, Jorys [4 ]
Slater, Elizabeth D. [7 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Texas Christian Univ, Anne Burnett Sch Med, Ft Worth, TX USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Loma Linda Univ Hlth Ctr, Loma Linda, CA USA
[7] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
[8] 1211 Med Ctr Dr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; SURFACE TEXTURE; BIA-ALCL; IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS; EXPERIENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/asj/sjad319
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma first linked with breast implants in 2011. The correlation between BIA-ALCL and textured devices has led to increased use of smooth devices. However, much of the data surrounding smooth and textured devices investigates breast implants specifically and not tissue expanders.Objectives We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes for smooth tissue expanders (STEs) and textured tissue expanders (TTEs).Methods A search was performed on PubMed, including articles from 2016 to 2023 (n = 419). Studies comparing TTEs and STEs and reported complications were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis.Results A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days. Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003).Results A total of 5 articles met inclusion criteria, representing 1709 patients in the STE cohort and 1716 patients in the TTE cohort. The mean duration of tissue expansion with STEs was 221.25 days, while TTEs had a mean time of tissue expansion of 220.43 days. Our meta-analysis found no differences in all surgical outcomes except for explantation risk. STE use was associated with increased odds of explantation by over 50% compared to TTE use (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.02; P = .003).Conclusions Overall, STEs and TTEs had similar complication profiles. However, STEs had 1.5 times higher odds of explantation. The incidence of BIA-ALCL is low, and only a single case of BIA-ALCL has been reported with TTEs. This indicates that TTEs are safe and may lower the risk of early complications requiring explantation. Further studies are warranted to further define the relationship between tissue expanders and BIA-ALCL.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 393
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complications of free bipedicled DIEP flaps in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khattab, Nada Raafat
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [22] Comparison of Auricle Reconstruction Using Tissue Expanders With Skin Grafting and Auricle Reconstruction Using Tissue Expanders Without Skin Grafting: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Pengfei
    Zhao, Shanbaga
    Wang, Changchen
    Pan, Bo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (04) : 1203 - 1208
  • [23] Implant vs. autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies comparing surgical approaches in 55,455 patients
    Stefura, Tomasz
    Rusinek, Jakub
    Wator, Julia
    Zagorski, Adrian
    Zajac, Maciej
    Libondi, Guido
    Wysocki, Wojciech M.
    Koziej, Mateusz
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 77 : 346 - 358
  • [24] Laparoscopic VS open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Hui
    Zheng, Jun
    Cai, Jian-Ye
    Li, Shi-Hui
    Zhang, Jun-Bin
    Wang, Xiao-Ming
    Chen, Gui-Hua
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Gen-Shu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (43) : 7791 - 7806
  • [25] Subfascial Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Capsular Contracture
    Gould, Daniel J.
    Shauly, Orr
    Ohanissian, Levonti
    Stevens, W. Grant
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL OPEN FORUM, 2020, 2 (01):
  • [26] Laparoscopic vs open pyloromyotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sola, Juan E.
    Neville, Holly L.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2009, 44 (08) : 1631 - 1637
  • [27] Comparing Complications of Biologic and Synthetic Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Choi, Young-Soo
    You, Hi-Jin
    Lee, Tae-Yul
    Kim, Deok-Woo
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2023, 50 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [28] Prevention of Postoperative Complications by Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Yo-Han
    Yang, Yun-Jung
    Lee, Dong-Won
    Song, Seung-Yong
    Lew, Dae-Hyun
    Yang, Eun-Jung
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (01) : 10E - 24E
  • [29] Materials Used in Cranial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khalid, Syed, I
    Thomson, Kyle B.
    Maasarani, Samantha
    Wiegmann, Aaron L.
    Smith, Jenny
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Mehta, Ankit, I
    Dorafshar, Amir H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 164 : E945 - E963
  • [30] Use of supermicrosurgery in craniofacial and head and neck soft tissue reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
    MacKenzie, Alexandra
    Dhoot, Amber
    Rehman, Umar
    Sarwar, Mohammad Sohaib
    Adebayo, Oluwasemilore
    Brennan, Peter A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 62 (02) : 140 - 149