Conceptualizations of Permanency in an Online Foster Care Community

被引:1
|
作者
Fowler, John [1 ,3 ]
Day, Angelique [1 ]
Zachry, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Social Work, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Human Ctr Design & Engn, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[3] Univ Washington, 4101 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
来源
FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES | 2025年 / 106卷 / 01期
关键词
foster care; online; advocacy; adolescents / young adults; humanism; logistic regression; YOUTH; CHILDREN; WELFARE; FAMILY; LEGAL;
D O I
10.1177/10443894231209799
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Permanency generally refers to long-lasting family connections and support for youth. Historically, the U.S. child welfare system has focused primarily on legal permanency. Relational and cultural permanency has recently gained some attention while being largely left out of federal policy. This study provides a statistical analysis of permanency-related terms in posts from an online community of people with lived experience in foster care. The results indicate that people with lived experience discussed topics of legal, relational, and cultural permanency more frequently than people who have not spent time in foster care, with a focus on aging out, religion, holidays, friends, loneliness, and community. People with lived experience also discussed permanency-related topics in help-seeking ways. Implications include the need to broaden the understanding of permanency through recommendations for policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 44
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 24-month update on the impact of roundtables on permanency for youth in foster care
    Davis, Cynthia W.
    O'Brien, Kirk
    Rogg, Carla S.
    Morgan, Linda Jewell
    White, Catherine Roller
    Houston, Millicent
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2013, 35 (12) : 2128 - 2134
  • [22] Foster Care Reentry: A survival analysis assessing differences across permanency type
    Goering, Emily Smith
    Shaw, Terry V.
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2017, 68 : 36 - 43
  • [23] Systematic literature review of foster and adoptive caregiver factors for increasing placement stability and permanency
    Vanderwill, Lori A.
    Salazar, Amy M.
    Jenkins, Garrett
    Larwelle, Jessica De
    McMahon, Amanda K.
    Day, Angelique
    Haggerty, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC CHILD WELFARE, 2021, 15 (04) : 487 - 527
  • [24] The Association Between Permanency and Length of Time in Foster Care for Children with Older Adult Foster Caregivers: Children Removed Due to Substance Use Behavior
    Parekh, Rupal
    Sieger, Margaret Lloyd
    Elsaesser, Caitlin
    Mauldin, Rebecca
    Champagne, Lukas
    CHILD & YOUTH CARE FORUM, 2024, 53 (01) : 51 - 72
  • [25] Permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Testing the external validity of kinship effects
    Koh, Eun
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2010, 32 (03) : 389 - 398
  • [26] Pathways to Permanency: A Systematic Review of Factors Associated with Family Reunification After Foster Care
    Sitjes-Figueras, Rosa
    Maneiro, Lorena
    Garcia-Molsosa, Marta
    Lopez-Lopez, Monica
    CHILD & YOUTH CARE FORUM, 2025,
  • [27] Initial Health Outcomes of a Community-Based Collaboration for Children in Foster Care
    Espeleta, Hannah C.
    Schelbe, Lisa
    Ruggiero, Kenneth J.
    Klika, J. Bart
    HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2024, 49 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [28] Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption
    Akin, Becci A.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2011, 33 (06) : 999 - 1011
  • [29] The Experiment of Foster Care
    Broady, Timothy R.
    Stoyles, Gerard J.
    McMullan, Kim
    Caputi, Peter
    Crittenden, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2010, 19 (05) : 559 - 571
  • [30] Measuring care coordination by social workers in a foster care medical home
    Hoffmann, Laurel Murphy
    Woods, Madeline Lowry
    Vaz, Louise Elaine
    Blaschke, Gregory
    Grigsby, Tamara
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 60 (05) : 467 - 480