Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems

被引:2
|
作者
Collins, Marissa [1 ]
Mazzei, Micaela [1 ]
Baker, Rachel [1 ]
Morton, Alec [2 ]
Frith, Lucy [3 ]
Syrett, Keith [4 ]
Leak, Paul [5 ]
Donaldson, Cam [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Yunus Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Social Eth & Policy, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Law Sch, Bristol, England
[5] Scottish Govt, Directorate Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Priority setting; Resource allocation; Integration; Economics; Decision science; Ethics; Law; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09866-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is an international move towards greater integration of health and social care to cope with the increasing demand on services.. In Scotland, legislation was passed in 2014 to integrate adult health and social care services resulting in the formation of 31 Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs). Greater integration does not eliminate resource scarcity and the requirement to make (resource) allocation decisions to meet the needs of local populations. There are different perspectives on how to facilitate and improve priority setting in health and social care organisations with limited resources, but structured processes at the local level are still not widely implemented. This paper reports on work with new HSCPs in Scotland to develop a combined multi-disciplinary priority setting and resource allocation framework.MethodsTo develop the combined framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to determine the key principles and approaches to priority setting from economics, decision-analysis, ethics and law, and attempts to combine such approaches. Co-production of the combined framework involved a multi-disciplinary workshop including local, and national-level stakeholders and academics to discuss and gather their views.ResultsThe key findings from the literature review and the stakeholder workshop were taken to produce a final combined framework for priority setting and resource allocation. This is underpinned by principles from economics (opportunity cost), decision science (good decisions), ethics (justice) and law (fair procedures). It outlines key stages in the priority setting process, including: framing the question, looking at current use of resources, defining options and criteria, evaluating options and criteria, and reviewing each stage. Each of these has further sub-stages and includes a focus on how the combined framework interacts with the consultation and involvement of patients, public and the wider staff.ConclusionsThe integration agenda for health and social care is an opportunity to develop and implement a combined framework for setting priorities and allocating resources fairly to meet the needs of the population. A key aim of both integration and the combined framework is to facilitate the shifting of resources from acute services to the community.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Are all health gains equally important? An exploration of acceptable health as a reference point in health care priority setting
    Wouters, S.
    van Exel, N. J. A.
    Rohde, K. I. M.
    Brouwer, W. B. F.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [42] Health technology assessment and its influence on health-care priority setting
    Oliver, A
    Mossialos, E
    Robinson, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [43] Accountable priority setting for trust in health systems - the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable health action in developing countries
    Jens Byskov
    Paul Bloch
    Astrid Blystad
    Anna-Karin Hurtig
    Knut Fylkesnes
    Peter Kamuzora
    Yeri Kombe
    Gunnar Kvåle
    Bruno Marchal
    Douglas K Martin
    Charles Michelo
    Benedict Ndawi
    Thabale J Ngulube
    Isaac Nyamongo
    Øystein E Olsen
    Washington Onyango-Ouma
    Ingvild F Sandøy
    Elizabeth H Shayo
    Gavin Silwamba
    Nils Gunnar Songstad
    Mary Tuba
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 7 (1)
  • [44] User charges and priority setting in health care: balancing equity and efficiency
    Smith, PC
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (05) : 1018 - 1029
  • [45] Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries
    Lindsay M Sabik
    Reidar K Lie
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 7
  • [46] Priority setting in health care and higher order degree change in risk
    Courbage, Christophe
    Rey, Beatrice
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 31 (03) : 484 - 489
  • [47] Priority setting in health care: trends and models from Scandinavian experiences
    Hofmann, Bjorn
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 16 (03) : 349 - 356
  • [48] Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care
    Weale, Albert
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Tugendhaft, Aviva
    Tumilty, Emma
    Weerasuriya, Krisantha
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (05) : 736 - 750
  • [49] Priority setting in health care: trends and models from Scandinavian experiences
    Bjørn Hofmann
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2013, 16 : 349 - 356
  • [50] Priority setting in health care as portrayed in South Korean and Israeli newspapers
    Factor, Roni
    Kang, Minah
    HEALTH POLICY, 2014, 114 (2-3) : 226 - 235