Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems

被引:2
|
作者
Collins, Marissa [1 ]
Mazzei, Micaela [1 ]
Baker, Rachel [1 ]
Morton, Alec [2 ]
Frith, Lucy [3 ]
Syrett, Keith [4 ]
Leak, Paul [5 ]
Donaldson, Cam [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Yunus Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Social Eth & Policy, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Law Sch, Bristol, England
[5] Scottish Govt, Directorate Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Priority setting; Resource allocation; Integration; Economics; Decision science; Ethics; Law; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09866-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is an international move towards greater integration of health and social care to cope with the increasing demand on services.. In Scotland, legislation was passed in 2014 to integrate adult health and social care services resulting in the formation of 31 Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs). Greater integration does not eliminate resource scarcity and the requirement to make (resource) allocation decisions to meet the needs of local populations. There are different perspectives on how to facilitate and improve priority setting in health and social care organisations with limited resources, but structured processes at the local level are still not widely implemented. This paper reports on work with new HSCPs in Scotland to develop a combined multi-disciplinary priority setting and resource allocation framework.MethodsTo develop the combined framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to determine the key principles and approaches to priority setting from economics, decision-analysis, ethics and law, and attempts to combine such approaches. Co-production of the combined framework involved a multi-disciplinary workshop including local, and national-level stakeholders and academics to discuss and gather their views.ResultsThe key findings from the literature review and the stakeholder workshop were taken to produce a final combined framework for priority setting and resource allocation. This is underpinned by principles from economics (opportunity cost), decision science (good decisions), ethics (justice) and law (fair procedures). It outlines key stages in the priority setting process, including: framing the question, looking at current use of resources, defining options and criteria, evaluating options and criteria, and reviewing each stage. Each of these has further sub-stages and includes a focus on how the combined framework interacts with the consultation and involvement of patients, public and the wider staff.ConclusionsThe integration agenda for health and social care is an opportunity to develop and implement a combined framework for setting priorities and allocating resources fairly to meet the needs of the population. A key aim of both integration and the combined framework is to facilitate the shifting of resources from acute services to the community.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Democratic institutional design in health care priority setting and rationing
    Landwehr, Claudia
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2012, 106 (06): : 407 - 411
  • [32] Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
    Joan Costa-Font
    Frank Cowell
    Social Justice Research, 2019, 32 : 172 - 185
  • [33] Needs and cost-effectiveness in health care priority setting
    Gustavsson, Erik
    Tinghog, Gustav
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (03) : 611 - 619
  • [34] Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience
    Ham, C
    HEALTH POLICY, 1997, 42 (01) : 49 - 66
  • [35] Priority setting for systematic review of health care interventions in Nigeria
    Meremikwu, Martin
    Udoh, Ekong
    Nwagbara, Bridget
    Effa, Emmanuel
    Oringanje, Chioma
    Edet, Bassey
    Nwagbara, Eucharia
    Bello, Segun
    Eke, Felix
    HEALTH POLICY, 2011, 99 (03) : 244 - 249
  • [36] Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting
    Costa-Font, Joan
    Cowell, Frank
    SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2019, 32 (02) : 172 - 185
  • [37] Should relational effects be considered in health care priority setting?
    Gustavsson, Erik
    Juth, Niklas
    Larfars, Gerd
    Raaschou, Pauline
    Sandman, Lars
    BIOETHICS, 2023, 37 (07) : 668 - 673
  • [38] Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis
    Thierry Defechereux
    Francesco Paolucci
    Andrew Mirelman
    Sitaporn Youngkong
    Grete Botten
    Terje P Hagen
    Louis W Niessen
    BMC Health Services Research, 12
  • [39] Needs and cost-effectiveness in health care priority setting
    Erik Gustavsson
    Gustav Tinghög
    Health and Technology, 2020, 10 : 611 - 619
  • [40] Are all health gains equally important? An exploration of acceptable health as a reference point in health care priority setting
    S. Wouters
    N.J.A. van Exel
    K.I.M. Rohde
    W.B.F. Brouwer
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13