Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems

被引:2
|
作者
Collins, Marissa [1 ]
Mazzei, Micaela [1 ]
Baker, Rachel [1 ]
Morton, Alec [2 ]
Frith, Lucy [3 ]
Syrett, Keith [4 ]
Leak, Paul [5 ]
Donaldson, Cam [1 ]
机构
[1] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Yunus Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Social Eth & Policy, Manchester, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Law Sch, Bristol, England
[5] Scottish Govt, Directorate Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
关键词
Priority setting; Resource allocation; Integration; Economics; Decision science; Ethics; Law; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; ACCOUNTABILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-023-09866-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is an international move towards greater integration of health and social care to cope with the increasing demand on services.. In Scotland, legislation was passed in 2014 to integrate adult health and social care services resulting in the formation of 31 Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs). Greater integration does not eliminate resource scarcity and the requirement to make (resource) allocation decisions to meet the needs of local populations. There are different perspectives on how to facilitate and improve priority setting in health and social care organisations with limited resources, but structured processes at the local level are still not widely implemented. This paper reports on work with new HSCPs in Scotland to develop a combined multi-disciplinary priority setting and resource allocation framework.MethodsTo develop the combined framework, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to determine the key principles and approaches to priority setting from economics, decision-analysis, ethics and law, and attempts to combine such approaches. Co-production of the combined framework involved a multi-disciplinary workshop including local, and national-level stakeholders and academics to discuss and gather their views.ResultsThe key findings from the literature review and the stakeholder workshop were taken to produce a final combined framework for priority setting and resource allocation. This is underpinned by principles from economics (opportunity cost), decision science (good decisions), ethics (justice) and law (fair procedures). It outlines key stages in the priority setting process, including: framing the question, looking at current use of resources, defining options and criteria, evaluating options and criteria, and reviewing each stage. Each of these has further sub-stages and includes a focus on how the combined framework interacts with the consultation and involvement of patients, public and the wider staff.ConclusionsThe integration agenda for health and social care is an opportunity to develop and implement a combined framework for setting priorities and allocating resources fairly to meet the needs of the population. A key aim of both integration and the combined framework is to facilitate the shifting of resources from acute services to the community.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing a combined framework for priority setting in integrated health and social care systems
    Marissa Collins
    Micaela Mazzei
    Rachel Baker
    Alec Morton
    Lucy Frith
    Keith Syrett
    Paul Leak
    Cam Donaldson
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [2] Ethical basis of priority setting in health care
    Marckmann, G.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2010, 53 (09) : 867 - 873
  • [3] Priority setting in Swedish health care: Are the politicians ready?
    Rosen, Per
    Licht, Jenny De Fine
    Ohlsson, Henrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 42 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [4] A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions
    Martin, D
    Singer, P
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [5] Formal priority setting in health care: the Swedish experience
    Garpenby, Peter
    Backman, Karin
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (06) : 891 - 907
  • [6] A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions
    Doug Martin
    Peter Singer
    Health Care Analysis, 2003, 11 : 59 - 68
  • [7] Priority setting in primary health care: a framework for local catchments
    McDonald, J.
    Ollerenshaw, A.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2011, 11 (02):
  • [8] The elusive challenge of priority setting in health and health care
    Norheim, Ole F.
    GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2017, 1 (01) : 28 - 29
  • [9] Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
    Mitton, Craig
    Smith, Neale
    Peacock, Stuart
    Evoy, Brian
    Abelson, Julia
    HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 91 (03) : 219 - 228
  • [10] QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGIES IN HEALTH-CARE PRIORITY SETTING RESEARCH
    Smith, Neale
    Mitton, Craig
    Peacock, Stuart
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 18 (10) : 1163 - 1175