Integrated management of safety and security (IMSS) in the nuclear industry-Organizational culture perspective

被引:4
作者
Ylonen, Marja [1 ]
Bjorkman, Kim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, POB 8600, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland Ltd, VTT, POB 1000, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland
关键词
Safety; Security; Integrated management; Risk; Organizational culture; SYSTEMS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106236
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The study is inspired by the change in the risk landscape caused by the development of digitalization and automation in the high-risk industry. The increasing convergence of process-safety, physical security, and cybersecurity risks can lead to major accidents. Integrated management of safety and security (IMSS) is a necessary means of preventing and preparing for accidents. The objective of this paper is to get new insights into the current state of IMSS and related challenges in the nuclear industry. The data includes the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and World Institute for Nuclear Security (WINS) reports, articles on digitalization, IMSS, and interviews with safety and security experts from two power companies and the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Finland. The paper compares the results with those in Seveso installations. The methods are thematic and qualitative content analysis. Theoretical framework consists of organizational culture and management perspectives. The paper provides new meanings to the ways in which IMSS is currently implemented. The paper shows the IAEA structural support to IMSS, differences in IMSS implementation in the nuclear industry, and organizational cultural aspects that constrain the IMSS. The latter include the subordination of security to safety, the assumption that organizational culture automatically integrates safety and security, the lack of co-identification and co-assessment of safety and security risks, which prevents a better understanding of systemic risks. The conclusion is that the current state of IMSS is not adequate to address converging, systemic risks, and coordination of safety and security aspects requires more attention.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [21] Safety management in different high-risk domains - All the same?
    Grote, Gudela
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (10) : 1983 - 1992
  • [22] (Mis)understanding Safety Culture and Its Relationship to Safety Management
    Guldenmund, Frank W.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (10) : 1466 - 1480
  • [23] The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research
    Guldenmund, FW
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2000, 34 (1-3) : 215 - 257
  • [24] Hanninen V., 2016, AIKUISKASVATUS, V36, P109, DOI [10.33336/aik.88484, DOI 10.33336/AIK.88484]
  • [25] Safety in System-of-Systems: Ten key challenges
    Harvey, Catherine
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 70 : 358 - 366
  • [26] Theories of (safety) culture revisited - An anthropological approach
    Haukelid, K.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (03) : 413 - 426
  • [27] The constitution and effects of safety culture as an object in the discourse of accident prevention: A Foucauldian approach
    Henriqson, Eder
    Schuler, Betina
    van Winsen, Roel
    Dekker, Sidney W. A.
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 70 : 465 - 476
  • [28] Holappa J., 2017, ATS YDINTEKNIIKKA, V2, P23
  • [29] Analysis of Cybersecurity-related Incidents in the Process Industry
    Iaiani, Matteo
    Tugnoli, Alessandro
    Bonvicini, Sarah
    Cozzani, Valerio
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 209
  • [30] Major accidents triggered by malicious manipulations of the control system in process facilities
    Iaiani, Matteo
    Tugnoli, Alessandro
    Bonvicini, Sarah
    Cozzani, Valerio
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2021, 134