Sparse representation learning using l1-2 compressed sensing and rank-revealing QR factorization

被引:5
作者
Moslemi, Amir [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Phys Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys & Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Phys Sci, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
关键词
Compressive sensing; Sparsity; Optimal sensors; RRQR and l1-2 minimization; SENSOR PLACEMENT; EMPHYSEMA DISTRIBUTION; RECONSTRUCTION; RECOGNITION; ALGORITHMS; PROJECTION; RECOVERY; PCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106663
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Compressive sensing can be conceptualized for a classification problem in the context of representation learning, which is frequently applied for signal reconstruction via a few measurements. A novel compressive sensing-based approach is presented to substantially reduce the number of required samples for classification. This technique considers the pixels of image as sensors and it seeks to identify the most optimum sensors as decision variables in feature space. In this study, Spatial sensor locations are acquired through learning to identify the regions within an image where the most discriminative information for classification is embedded. ������1-2 minimization, as nonconvex but Lipschitz continuous, is solved to obtain the least non-zero elements of the full measurement vector to completely reconstruct the discriminative vector in feature space. Optimal sensors are localized from the training-set and subsequent test images are categorized based on learned sensors. The algorithm consists of three primary components: sparse minimization, feature space, and discrimination vector. ������1-2 minimization, rank-revealing QR factorization (RRQR) and SVM are considered for enhanced sparsity exploitation, feature space extraction and discrimination vector acquiring, respectively. The proposed method is evaluated on four different experiments and is compared against a state-of-art technique. The results demonstrate the superiority of proposed method to the compared method.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1984, C MOD AN PROB 1984
  • [2] Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection
    Belhumeur, PN
    Hespanha, JP
    Kriegman, DJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 19 (07) : 711 - 720
  • [3] Lobar Emphysema Distribution Is Associated With 5-Year Radiological Disease Progression
    Boueiz, Adel
    Chang, Yale
    Cho, Michael H.
    Washko, George R.
    San Jose Estepar, Raul
    Bowler, Russell P.
    Crapo, James D.
    DeMeo, Dawn L.
    Dy, Jennifer G.
    Silverman, Edwin K.
    Castaldi, Peter J.
    [J]. CHEST, 2018, 153 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [4] Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers
    Boyd S.
    Parikh N.
    Chu E.
    Peleato B.
    Eckstein J.
    [J]. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2010, 3 (01): : 1 - 122
  • [5] SPARSE SENSOR PLACEMENT OPTIMIZATION FOR CLASSIFICATION
    Brunton, B. W.
    Brunton, S. L.
    Proctor, J. L.
    Kutz, J. N.
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2016, 76 (05) : 2099 - 2122
  • [6] Candes E., 2006, INT C MATH, V3, P1433, DOI DOI 10.4171/022-3/69
  • [7] Robust uncertainty principles:: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information
    Candès, EJ
    Romberg, J
    Tao, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2006, 52 (02) : 489 - 509
  • [8] Decoding by linear programming
    Candes, EJ
    Tao, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2005, 51 (12) : 4203 - 4215
  • [9] ON RANK-REVEALING FACTORIZATIONS
    CHANDRASEKARAN, S
    IPSEN, ICF
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON MATRIX ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 1994, 15 (02) : 592 - 622
  • [10] Exact reconstruction of sparse signals via nonconvex minimization
    Chartrand, Rick
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2007, 14 (10) : 707 - 710