Reference values for 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging of the portal venous system

被引:5
作者
Huang, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Roberts, Grant S. [3 ]
Roldan-Alzate, Alejandro [4 ,5 ]
Wieben, Oliver [3 ]
Reeder, Scott B. [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Oechtering, Thekla H. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Vasc Surg Sect, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Mech Engn, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biomed Engn, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Emergency Med, Madison, WI USA
[8] Univ Lubeck, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Lubeck, Germany
关键词
4D flow MRI; Portal vein; Portal hypertension; Reference values; PHASE-CONTRAST MRI; BLOOD-FLOW; SPLANCHNIC ARTERIAL; HEMODYNAMICS; CIRRHOSIS; VISUALIZATION; FEASIBILITY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-03892-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this work was to establish normal reference values for 4D flow MRI-derived flow, velocity, and vessel diameters, and to define characteristic flow patterns in the portal venous system of healthy adult subjects. Methods For this retrospective study, we screened all available 4D flow MRI exams of the upper abdomen in healthy adults acquired at our institution between 2012 and 2022 at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI after >= 5 h fasting. Flow, velocity, and effective diameter were quantified in the 8 planes in the portal venous system (splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein, main, right, and left portal veins). Vessel delineation was manually adjusted over time. Reference ranges for were defined as the mean +/- 2 standard deviations. Three readers noted helical and vortical flow on time-resolved pathline visualizations. Conservation of mass flow analysis was performed for quality assurance. Results We included 44 healthy subjects (26 female, 18-74 years) in the analysis. We report reference values for mean and peak flow, mean velocity, and vessel diameter in the healthy portal vein using 4D flow MRI. Normal flow patterns in the portal vein included faint helical (66%) or linear flow ( 34%). Conservation of mass analysis demonstrated a relative error of 1.1 +/- 4.6% standard deviation (SD) at the splenomesenteric confluence and - 1.4 +/- 4.1% SD at the portal bifurcation. Conclusion We have reported normal hemodynamic values that are necessary baseline data for emerging clinical applications of 4D flow MRI in the portal venous system. Results are consistent with previously published values from smaller cohorts. [Graphical abstract]
引用
收藏
页码:2049 / 2059
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterization of mesenteric and portal hemodynamics using 4D flow MRI: the effects of meals and diurnal variation
    Roldan-Alzate, Alejandro
    Campo, Camilo A.
    Mao, Lu
    Said, Adnan
    Wieben, Oliver
    Reeder, Scott B.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (06) : 2106 - 2114
  • [22] 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease Demonstrates Altered Distribution of Aortic Blood Flow Helicity
    Lorenz, R.
    Bock, J.
    Barker, A. J.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F.
    Wallis, W.
    Korvink, J. G.
    Bissell, M. M.
    Schulz-Menger, J.
    Markl, M.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 71 (04) : 1542 - 1553
  • [23] Abdominal Applications of 4D Flow MRI
    Riedel, Christoph
    Lenz, Alexander
    Fischer, Lutz
    Li, Jun
    Piecha, Feilix
    Kluwe, Johannes
    Adam, Gerhard
    Bannas, Peter
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2021, 193 (04): : 388 - 398
  • [24] Left ventricular diastolic early and late filling quantified from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging
    Alattar, Yousef
    Soulat, Gilles
    Gencer, Umit
    Messas, Emmanuel
    Bollache, Emilie
    Kachenoura, Nadjia
    Mousseaux, Elie
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (7-8) : 345 - 352
  • [25] Portal venous aneurysm demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging
    Kim, EE
    Romero, J
    Kim, CG
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 1998, 22 (05) : 360 - 363
  • [26] 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement
    Petter Dyverfeldt
    Malenka Bissell
    Alex J. Barker
    Ann F. Bolger
    Carl-Johan Carlhäll
    Tino Ebbers
    Christopher J. Francios
    Alex Frydrychowicz
    Julia Geiger
    Daniel Giese
    Michael D. Hope
    Philip J. Kilner
    Sebastian Kozerke
    Saul Myerson
    Stefan Neubauer
    Oliver Wieben
    Michael Markl
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17
  • [27] Intracardiac Flow at 4D CT: Comparison with 4D Flow MRI
    Lantz, Jonas
    Gupta, Vikas
    Henriksson, Lilian
    Karlsson, Matts
    Persson, Anders
    Carlhall, Carl-Johan
    Ebbers, Tino
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [28] Hemodynamic Disturbances in Posterior Circulation Stroke: 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Added to Computed Tomography Angiography
    Malm, Jan
    Birnefeld, Johan
    Zarrinkoob, Laleh
    Wahlin, Anders
    Eklund, Anders
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [29] Comparison of Blood Flow Velocity Quantification by 4D Flow MR Imaging with Ultrasound at the Carotid Bifurcation
    Harloff, A.
    Zech, T.
    Wegent, F.
    Strecker, C.
    Weiller, C.
    Markl, M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (07) : 1407 - 1413
  • [30] 4D Flow MR Imaging of Ophthalmic Artery Flow in Patients with Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
    Sekine, Tetsuro
    Takagi, Ryo
    Amano, Yasuo
    Murai, Yasuo
    Orita, Erika
    Fukushima, Yoshimitsu
    Matsumura, Yoshio
    Kumita, Shin-ichiro
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 17 (01) : 13 - 20