Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Current Situation and Screening in North and Central Asian Countries

被引:12
|
作者
Dutta, Arunima [1 ]
Pratiti, Rebecca [2 ]
Kalantary, Atefeh [2 ]
Aboulian, Armen [3 ]
Shekherdimian, Shant [4 ]
机构
[1] Franciscan Hlth, Dept Internal Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] McLaren Hlth Care, Dept Internal Med, Flint, MI 48532 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Surg, Woodland Hills, CA USA
[4] Ronald Reagan Univ Calif Los Angeles UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
cancer registries; cancer screening; north and central asian countries; low-middle income countries; colorectal neoplasms; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; EAST AZERBAIJAN; RECENT TRENDS; COLONOSCOPY; MORTALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURVIVAL; REGISTRY; TESTS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33424
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the past few decades. A significant proportion of this increase is from low to middle income countries (LMIC). CRC prevalence is also increasing in North and Central Asian Countries (NCAC). Screening for colorectal cancer has decreased CRC mortality but data regarding screening practices in NCAC is limited. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane for current colorectal cancer screening practices in NCAC. Incidence and mortality rates were derived from public health agency websites to calculate age-standardized CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios. Web-based online break-point testing defined as statistical major changes in CRC mortality trends was completed. Among the 677 screened studies, 37 studies met the criteria for inclusion for review. CRC screening in NCAC is not organized, although most countries have cancer registries. The data availability is scarce, and most data is prior to 2017. Most studies are observational. There is minimal data about colonoscopy preparations, adenoma detection and complications rates. The polyp detection rates (PDRs) and adenoma detection rates (ADRs) seem low to optimal in this region. Commonly measured outcomes include participation rate, fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) positivity rate and cost-benefit measures. Lower mortality-to-incidence ratios is seen in countries with screening programs. Kazakhstan and Lithuania with screening programs have achieved breakpoint suggesting major changes in CRC mortality trends. Data about CRC screening varies widely within NCAC. High human developmental index (HDI) countries like Lithuania and Estonia have higher incidence of CRC and mortality. Seven NCAC have CRC screening programs with most utilizing non-invasive methods for screening. Data collection is regional and not organized. The ADR and PDR are low to optimal in this region and cancer detection rates are comparable to other high-income countries (HIC). CRC detection rate is 0.05% for screening in Kazakhstan and 0.2% for screening in Lithuania. Very limited information is available on the actual cost and logistics of implementing a CRC screening program. All NCAC have a cancer registry, with some having a high-quality registry showing national coverage with good validity and completeness. Establishing guideline-based registries and increasing screening efficacy could improve CRC outcomes in NCAC.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metformin and Colorectal Cancer - A Systematic Review
    Kobiela, Jarek
    Dobrzycka, Malgorzata
    Jedrusik, Piotr
    Kobiela, Paulina
    Spychalski, Piotr
    Sledzinski, Zbigniew
    Zdrojewski, Tomasz
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2019, 127 (07) : 445 - 454
  • [32] Current Options in the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Developing Countries: Central America Experience
    Ochoa-Hernandez, Anny
    Giron, Karen
    Meier, Jennie
    Charchalac, Ana Paulina
    CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 16 (03) : 49 - 54
  • [33] Cancer screening and early diagnosis in low and middle income countries Current situation and future perspectives
    Mandal, Ranajit
    Basu, Partha
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2018, 61 (12) : 1505 - 1512
  • [34] Predictors of treatment refusal in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Moodley, Yoshan
    Govender, Kumeren
    van Wyk, Jacqueline
    Reddy, Seren
    Ning, Yuming
    Wexner, Steven
    Stopforth, Laura
    Bhadree, Shona
    Naidoo, Vasudevan
    Kader, Shakeel
    Cheddie, Shalen
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49 (06) : 456 - 464
  • [35] Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of Models to Predict Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia
    Ma, Gene K.
    Ladabaum, Uri
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 12 (10) : 1624 - U84
  • [36] Mailed Outreach Is Superior to Usual Care Alone for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the USA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jager, Mark
    Demb, Josh
    Asghar, Ali
    Selby, Kevin
    Mello, Evelyn Marquez
    Heskett, Karen M.
    Lieberman, Alicea J.
    Geng, Zhuo
    Bharti, Balambal
    Singh, Siddharth
    Gupta, Samir
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2019, 64 (09) : 2489 - 2496
  • [37] Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations
    Florence Bénard
    Alan N Barkun
    Myriam Martel
    Daniel von Renteln
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2018, 24 (01) : 124 - 138
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review
    Gheysariyeha, Fatemeh
    Rahimi, Farimah
    Tabesh, Elham
    Hemami, Mohsen Rezaei
    Adibi, Payman
    Rezayatmand, Reza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [39] Mass screening for colorectal cancer is not justified in most developing countries
    Lambert, Rene
    Sauvaget, Catherine
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 125 (02) : 253 - 256
  • [40] Current principles in the screening, diagnosis, and therapy of colorectal cancer
    Khatkov, I. E.
    Kagramanova, A. V.
    Zakharzhevskaya, N. B.
    Babikova, E. A.
    Generozov, E. V.
    Shcherbakov, P. L.
    Parfenov, A. I.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2016, 88 (02) : 90 - 96