Addressing the eco-gender gap in men through power and sustainability self-efficacy

被引:4
作者
Newman, Kevin P. P. [1 ]
Trump, Rebecca K. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Providence Coll, Arthur F Patricia Ryan Ctr Business Studies, Mkt, 1 Cunningham Sq, Providence, RI 02918 USA
[2] Loyola Univ Maryland, Sellinger Sch Business & Management, Mkt, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Sustainable brands; Sustainable consumption; Self-efficacy; Gender; Power; Men; CONSUMER REACTIONS; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIONS; RESPONSES; BEHAVIOR; ROLES; LEVEL; GUILT; RISK;
D O I
10.1057/s41262-022-00300-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is in society's best interest for people to consume sustainably. However, some consumers are less likely to do so, with men (vs. women) being more resistant to engaging in sustainable consumption. This research explores this eco-gender gap by identifying methods to improve men's responses (brand attitudes and self-brand connections) to sustainable brands. Three experiments demonstrate that men (self-identified) respond more favorably to sustainable brands when they feel powerful or have a sense of sustainability self-efficacy, meaning they believe their sustainable actions can have a positive societal impact. Study 1 finds that men respond more favorably to sustainable brands when experiencing a high (vs. low) sense of power, and this is mediated by their perceptions of sustainability self-efficacy. Study 2 demonstrates that a high (vs. low) sense of sustainability self-efficacy increases men's responses to sustainable brands even when their sense of power is low. Study 3 confirms that the positive effect of power on men's responses to sustainable brands only emerges for sustainable, not conventional brands. These findings indicate that promoting sustainable consumption among men should focus on making them feel powerful and/or capable of making a positive societal impact.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 274
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (01) :45-57
[2]   Power, optimism, and risk-taking [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Galinsky, Adam D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (04) :511-536
[3]  
Anshelm J., 2014, NORMA, V9, P84, DOI [DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005, https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2014.908627, DOI 10.1080/18902138.2014.908627]
[4]   Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices [J].
Antonetti, Paolo ;
Maklan, Stan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 124 (01) :117-134
[5]  
Bakan D., 1966, DUALITY HUMAN EXISTE
[6]   Does a 'care orientation' explain gender differences in ethical decision making? A critical analysis and fresh findings [J].
Bampton, Roberta ;
Maclagan, Patrick .
BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2009, 18 (02) :179-191
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[8]   SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) :122-147
[9]   Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type [J].
Banerjee, SB ;
Iyer, ES ;
Kashyap, RK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (02) :106-122
[10]   The role of social identity and attitudes toward sustainability brands in buying behaviors for organic products [J].
Bartels J. ;
Hoogendam K. .
Journal of Brand Management, 2011, 18 (9) :697-708