Conducting qualitative content analysis in urban planning research and urban studies

被引:24
作者
Sheydayi, Ailin [1 ]
Dadashpoor, Hashem [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Arts & Architecture, Urban & Reg Planning Dept, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Qualitative content analysis; Content analysis; Qualitative methods; Content analysis method; Research method; Urban planning research; Urban studies; Urban planning; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; NURSING-RESEARCH; GOVERNANCE; RESILIENCE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; DESIGN; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102878
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Qualitative content analysis as a kind of systematic analysis of qualitative data in which the latent values and meanings of the text are tried to be identified, described, and interpreted, is one of the most widely used qualitative methods in urban planning research and urban studies. However, the excessive flexibility and development of the method in other theoretical fields have obscured how to use it in the field of planning and urban studies. In this paper, we have tried to propose a procedural model that is suitable for the specific con-ditions and issues of the field by analyzing the content of the documents obtained from the systematic review of the theoretical literature of planning and urban studies that have used this method. This procedural model ex-plains the process of qualitative content analysis within five stages: choosing the type and theoretical context of data, explaining the objectives, deciding on how to analyze the data, deciding on how to interpret the data, and application of the interpretation results. Proposing the procedural model of qualitative content analysis that comes from the field of planning and urban studies can help, in addition to disambiguating the function of the method, make the method more visible and more correctly used in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   Managing wickedness in the Niger Delta: Can a new approach to multi-stakeholder governance increase voice and sustainability? [J].
Acey, Charisma .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2016, 154 :102-114
[2]   The contextualization of divergent outlooks in a Greenfield master-planned community: a pathway towards reflexivity [J].
Adeniyi, Ayodeji ;
Guaralda, Mirko ;
de Carvalho, Raul Dias .
INTERNATIONAL PLANNING STUDIES, 2018, 23 (01) :81-100
[3]  
Adler P.A., 1988, COLLECTING INTERPRET, P79
[4]   Understanding ICT's impacts on urban spaces: a qualitative content analysis of literature [J].
Afradi, Kazem ;
Nourian, Farshad .
GEOJOURNAL, 2022, 87 (02) :701-731
[5]   A review of domains, approaches, methods and indicators in peri-urbanization literature [J].
Ahani, Somayeh ;
Dadashpoor, Hashem .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 114
[6]   A survey of undergraduate course syllabi and a hybrid course on global urban topics [J].
Ali, Amal K. ;
Doan, Petra L. .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2006, 26 (02) :222-236
[7]  
Allmendinger P., 2002, PLAN THEOR, V1, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1177/147309520200100105, 10.1177/147309520200100105]
[8]   Classifying Regulatory Approaches of Jurisdictions for Accessory Dwelling Units: The Case of Long Island [J].
Anacker, Katrin B. B. ;
Niedt, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (01) :60-80
[9]   Missing the Housing for the Trees: Equity in Urban Climate Planning [J].
Angelo, Hillary ;
MacFarlane, Key ;
Sirigotis, James ;
Millard-Ball, Adam .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2022, :1415-1430
[10]   A crack in the Swedish welfare facade? A review of assessing social impacts in transport infrastructure planning [J].
Antonson, Hans ;
Levin, Lena .
PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 2020, 138