Robotics in Search and Rescue (SAR) Operations: An Ethical and Design Perspective Framework for Response Phase

被引:12
作者
Chitikena, Hareesh [1 ]
Sanfilippo, Filippo [1 ]
Ma, Shugen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agder UiA, Dept Engn Sci, Jon Lilletuns vei 9, N-4879 Grimstad, Norway
[2] Ritsumeikan Univ, Dept Robot, Kyoto 5258577, Japan
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Search and Rescue; service robot; snake robot; response phase; robot ethics; SNAKE ROBOTS; URBAN SEARCH; PERCEPTION; LOCOMOTION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.3390/app13031800
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Every year, especially in urban areas, the population density rises quickly. The effects of catastrophes (i.e., war, earthquake, fire, tsunami) on people are therefore significant and grave. Assisting the impacted people will soon involve human-robot Search and Rescue (SAR) operations. Therefore, it is crucial to connect contemporary technology (i.e., robots and cognitive approaches) to SAR to save human lives. However, these operations also call for careful consideration of several factors, including safety, severity, and resources. Hence, ethical issues with technologies in SAR must be taken into consideration at the development stage. In this study, the most relevant ethical and design issues that arise when using robotic and cognitive technology in SAR are discussed with a focus on the response phase. Among the vast variety of SAR robots that are available nowadays, snake robots have shown huge potential; as they could be fitted with sensors and used for transporting tools to hazardous or confined areas that other robots and humans are unable to access. With this perspective, particular emphasis has been put on snake robotics in this study by considering ethical and design issues. This endeavour will contribute to providing a broader knowledge of ethical and technological factors that must be taken into account throughout the design and development of snake robots.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 112 条
  • [31] De Cubber G., 2013, P 7 INT WORKSHOP ROB
  • [32] An Ethical Evaluation of Human-Robot Relationships
    de Graaf, Maartje M. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2016, 8 (04) : 589 - 598
  • [33] Destephe M, 2014, IEEE ROMAN, P261, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926263
  • [34] Doroftei Daniela, 2014, Applied Mechanics and Materials, V658, P612, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.658.612
  • [35] The Redesigned Serpens, a Low-Cost, Highly Compliant Snake Robot
    Duivon, Askan
    Kirsch, Pino
    Mauboussin, Boris
    Mougard, Gabriel
    Woszczyk, Jakub
    Sanfilippo, Filippo
    [J]. ROBOTICS, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [36] Erkmen I, 2002, IEEE ROBOT AUTOM MAG, V9, P17, DOI 10.1109/MRA.2002.1035210
  • [37] Ferrarini L, 2003, IEEE ASME INT C ADV, P1043
  • [38] Fu S., 2016, HDIAC Journal, V2, P4
  • [39] Gazebo, About us
  • [40] Acceptance and perceived usefulness of robots to assist with activities of daily living and healthcare tasks
    Hall, Amanda K.
    Backonja, Uba
    Painter, Ian
    Cakmak, Maya
    Sung, Minjung
    Lau, Timothy
    Thompson, Hilaire J.
    Demiris, George
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 31 (03) : 133 - 140