Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:28
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 : S73 - S84
  • [2] Fear of hypoglycaemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes
    Anderbro, T.
    Amsberg, S.
    Adamson, U.
    Bolinder, J.
    Lins, P. -E.
    Wredling, R.
    Moberg, E.
    Lisspers, J.
    Johansson, U. -B.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (10) : 1151 - 1158
  • [3] Morning administration of 0.4 U/kg/day insulin glargine 300 U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-hour pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100 U/mL in type 1 diabetes
    Bailey, T. S.
    Pettus, J.
    Roussel, R.
    Schmider, W.
    Maroccia, M.
    Nassr, N.
    Klein, O.
    Bolli, G. B.
    Dahmen, R.
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2018, 44 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [4] Battelino T., 2022, DIABETES TECHNOL THE, V24
  • [5] Comparison of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogs: A Review of the Evidence from Continuous Glucose Monitoring
    Battelino, Tadej
    Edelman, Steven
    Nishimura, Rimei
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 23 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [6] InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Study Design
    Battelino, Tadej
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Danne, Thomas
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Edelman, Steve
    Pilorget, Valerie
    Choudhary, Pratik
    Renard, Eric
    Bergenstal, Richard
    [J]. DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (04) : 1017 - 1027
  • [7] Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range
    Battelino, Tadej
    Danne, Thomas
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    Amiel, Stephanie A.
    Beck, Roy
    Biester, Torben
    Bosi, Emanuele
    Buckingham, Bruce A.
    Cefalu, William T.
    Close, Kelly L.
    Cobelli, Claudio
    Dassau, Eyal
    DeVries, J. Hans
    Donaghue, Kim C.
    Dovc, Klemen
    Doyle, Francis J.
    Garg, Satish
    Grunberger, George
    Heller, Simon
    Heinemann, Lutz
    Hirsch, Irl B.
    Hovorka, Roman
    Jia, Weiping
    Kordonouri, Olga
    Kovatchev, Boris
    Kowalski, Aaron
    Laffel, Lori
    Levine, Brian
    Mayorov, Alexander
    Mathieu, Chantal
    Murphy, Helen R.
    Nimri, Revital
    Norgaard, Kirsten
    Parkin, Christopher G.
    Renard, Eric
    Rodbard, David
    Saboo, Banshi
    Schatz, Desmond
    Stoner, Keaton
    Urakami, Tatsuiko
    Weinzimer, Stuart A.
    Phillip, Moshe
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 (08) : 1593 - 1603
  • [8] Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials
    Beck, Roy W.
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    Riddlesworth, Tonya D.
    Kollman, Craig
    Li, Zhaomian
    Brown, Adam S.
    Close, Kelly L.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 (03) : 400 - 405
  • [9] Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial
    Beck, Roy W.
    Riddlesworth, Tonya
    Ruedy, Katrina
    Ahmann, Andrew
    Bergenstal, Richard
    Haller, Stacie
    Kollman, Craig
    Kruger, Davida
    McGill, Janet B.
    Polonsky, William
    Toschi, Elena
    Wolpert, Howard
    Price, David
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (04): : 371 - 378
  • [10] New Insulin Glargine 300 Units.mL-1 Provides a More Even Activity Profile and Prolonged Glycemic Control at Steady State Compared With Insulin Glargine 100 Units.mL-1
    Becker, Reinhard H. A.
    Dahmen, Raphael
    Bergmann, Karin
    Lehmann, Anne
    Jax, Thomas
    Heise, Tim
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 (04) : 637 - 643