Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management

被引:54
|
作者
Yuan, Yuan [1 ,5 ]
Bai, Zhongke [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Zhang, Junjie [4 ,6 ]
Huang, Yuhan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Land Consolidat & Rehabil, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Technol Innovat Ctr Ecol Restorat Engn Min Area, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Res Inst, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, 29 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Res Inst, Guangzhou City 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Supply and demand assessment; Trade-offs; Spatial management; Changzhi City; LAND-USE; CARBON STORAGE; RIVER-BASIN; URBAN; LANDSCAPE; CAPACITY; INDICATORS; PATTERNS; CLIMATE; BUNDLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the supply and demand characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) and their trade-offs is the basis for effective ecosystem management and the improvement of human well-being. However, current management practices based on the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ESs remain limited. This study aimed to integrate ES trade-offs into regional spatial management. With Changzhi, China, as the study area, this study evaluated the supply, demand, and trade-offs of food provision, water conservation, soil retention, and carbon sequestration by linking multi-source data and using spatial analysis tools, including the InVEST model, ArcGIS, and GeoDA. Based on the trade-offs and importance of different ecological functions, we constructed an urban spatial management framework and proposed recommendations for optimization in different management zones. The results showed that (1) the supply and demand for multiple ESs exhibited spatial heterogeneity. Except for water conservation, the supply of other ESs met the demand of the city, but there were still obvious deficits in some regions. (2) In terms of the ES supply, there were trade-offs between food production and other ESs, and synergies existed among water conservation, soil retention, and carbon sequestration. In terms of the ES demand, the four ESs exhibited synergistic relationships. In the cluster analysis, ES supply and demand were divided into four ES bundles, respectively. (3) The spatial mismatch of ESs in the sub-watersheds of the study area was obvious. The ESDR coldspots for the four ESs were primarily located in the urban built-up areas in the central and southern regions of the city. The ESDR hotspots of soil retention and carbon sequestration were mainly distributed in the eastern and northwestern regions of Changzhi, which are less urbanized. There were few ESDR hotspots for food production and water conservation. (4) Based on the regional spatial management framework, Changzhi was divided into ten zones, including extremely important, moderately important, important, sup-ply-demand risk management, soil erosion management, and high food production areas. The results and con-clusions of this study provide a basis for spatial planning and ecosystem management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trade-offs and synergies between livestock production and other ecosystem services
    Accatino, Francesco
    Tonda, Alberto
    Dross, Camille
    Leger, Francois
    Tichit, Muriel
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 168 : 58 - 72
  • [22] Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot
    Chisholm, Ryan A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (10) : 1973 - 1987
  • [23] Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas
    Aryal, Kishor
    Maraseni, Tek
    Apan, Armando
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59
  • [24] Trade-offs between local and regional scale management of metapopulations
    Drechsler, M
    Wissel, C
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 83 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [25] Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Cork, Steven J.
    Agard, John
    Dobson, Andrew P.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (01):
  • [26] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [27] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Southwestern China
    Ran, Chen
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Tan, Qiu
    Zhao, Cuiwei
    Luo, Xuling
    Chen, Huan
    Xi, Huipeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (10) : 669 - 678
  • [28] Trade-offs in the provisioning and stability of ecosystem services in agroecosystems
    Montoya, Daniel
    Haegeman, Bart
    Gaba, Sabrina
    De Mazancourt, Claire
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Loreau, Michel
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (02)
  • [29] Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation Trade-offs and Governance
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    HRVATSKE VODE, 2019, 27 (107) : 77 - 78
  • [30] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR HUMAN WELLBEING Trade-offs and governance
    Mace, Georgina
    Schreckenberg, Kate
    Poudyal, Mahesh
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: TRADE-OFFS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, : 305 - 316