Early coronavirus disease 2019 restrictive measures and changes in maternal characteristics, use of assisted reproductive technology, and stillbirth

被引:8
作者
Lisonkova, Sarka [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bone, Jeffrey N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Muraca, Giulia M. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Razaz, Neda [7 ]
Boutin, Amelie [8 ,9 ]
Brandt, Justin S. [10 ]
Bedaiwy, Mohamed A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ananth, Cande, V [11 ,12 ,13 ,14 ,15 ]
Joseph, K. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Childrens & Womens Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Hlth Ctr British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods, Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Clin Epidemiol Div, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Reprod Mother & Youth Hlth & Populat Hlth & Optim, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[10] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[11] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[12] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Cardiovasc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[13] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Med, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[14] Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[15] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst, Piscataway, NJ USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; conception; coronavirus disease 2019; multiple birth; pandemic response; stillbirth; OUTCOMES; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.12925
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The initial COVID-19 pandemic response-related effects on conceptions following the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), and on changes in the maternal characteristics of women who conceived during the early vs. pre-pandemic period, have been understudied. Objectives To examine the effects of ART clinic closures in the United States (US) in March 2020 on the frequency of ART-conceived live births, multiple births and stillbirths; and to describe changes in the characteristics of women who conceived in the early pandemic period. Methods Population-based cohort study including all births in the US from January 2015 to December 2020 (22,907,688 live births; 134,537 stillbirths). Interrupted time series (ITS) methodology was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) of expected versus observed rates in December 2020 (i.e., among births conceived mainly in March 2020). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between mothers who conceived in March 2020 versus March 2015-2019. Results Overall, 1.1% of live births and 1.7% of stillbirths were conceived by ART. ART-conceived live births decreased by 57.0% in December 2020 (observed vs. expected RR 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.45), and these declines occurred in all subgroups of women. Multiple births also declined in December 2020. Stillbirth rates increased in December 2020 in ART-conceived births (RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.63, 3.92) but remained unchanged in the non-ART group. Maternal characteristics of women who conceived in the early pandemic versus pre-pandemic period differed and included an increased prevalence of pre-pregnancy obesity class 3 and chronic hypertension. Conclusions The early pandemic closure of ART clinics resulted in a substantial decline in ART-conceived live births and multiple births in December 2020 and an increase in the proportion of stillbirths among ART-conceived births. Women who conceived in the early pandemic period also had an increased prevalence of obesity and chronic hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2016, Obstet Gynecol, V128, pe61, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001643
  • [2] [Anonymous], What is Assisted Reproductive Technology?
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Patient management and clinical recommendations during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
  • [4] Confidence intervals for measures of interaction
    Assmann, SF
    Hosmer, DW
    Lemeshow, S
    Mundt, KA
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (03) : 286 - 290
  • [5] Ayenew B., 2020, MED LIFE CLIN, V2, P1012
  • [6] Abortion during the Covid-19 Pandemic-Ensuring Access to an Essential Health Service
    Bayefsky, Michelle J.
    Bartz, Deborah
    Watson, Katie L.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (19) : E47 - +
  • [7] Fertility patients under COVID-19: attitudes, perceptions and psychological reactions
    Ben-Kimhy, Reut
    Youngster, Michal
    Medina-Artom, Tamar R.
    Avraham, Sarit
    Gat, Itai
    Haham, Lilach Marom
    Hourvitz, Ariel
    Kedem, Alon
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (12) : 2774 - 2783
  • [8] Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals,coping and emotions
    Boivin, J.
    Harrison, C.
    Mathur, R.
    Burns, G.
    Pericleous-Smith, A.
    Gameiro, S.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (11) : 2556 - 2566
  • [9] Bolker B., 2008, Ecological models and data in R, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1442-9993.2010.02210.X
  • [10] Epidemiology of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: risk factors and associations with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes
    Brandt, Justin S.
    Hill, Jennifer
    Reddy, Ajay
    Schuster, Meike
    Patrick, Haylea S.
    Rosen, Todd
    Sauer, Mark V.
    Boyle, Carla
    Ananth, Cande V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (04) : 389.e1 - 389.e9