Explained variation and degrees of necessity and of sufficiency for competing risks survival data

被引:0
作者
Gleiss, Andreas [1 ]
Gnant, Michael [2 ]
Schemper, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Inst Clin Biometr, Ctr Med Data Sci, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Vienna, Austria
关键词
competing risks; explained variation; Fine and Gray model; necessary condition; sufficient condition; PREDICTIVE ACCURACY; MODELS; COX;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.202300140
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this contribution, the Schemper-Henderson measure of explained variation for survival outcomes is extended to accommodate competing events (CEs) in addition to events of interest. The extension is achieved by moving from the unconditional and conditional survival functions of the original measure to unconditional and conditional cumulative incidence functions, the latter obtained, for example, from Fine and Gray models. In the absence of CEs, the original measure is obtained as a special case. We define explained variation on the population level and provide two different types of estimates. Recently, the authors have achieved a multiplicative decomposition of explained variation into degrees of necessity and degrees of sufficiency. These measures are also extended to the case of competing risks survival data. A SAS macro and an R function are provided to facilitate application. Interesting empirical properties of the measures are explored on the population level and by an extensive simulation study. Advantages of the approach are exemplified by an Austrian study of breast cancer with a high proportion of CEs.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Clinical Significance of Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) in Melanoma: A Narrative Review from Adjuvant Clinical Trials [J].
Amabile, Simone ;
Roccuzzo, Gabriele ;
Pala, Valentina ;
Tonella, Luca ;
Rubatto, Marco ;
Merli, Martina ;
Fava, Paolo ;
Ribero, Simone ;
Fierro, Maria Teresa ;
Queirolo, Paola ;
Quaglino, Pietro .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (23)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Competing Risks and Multistate Models with R. Use R!New
[3]   Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Fine, Jason P. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (27) :4391-4400
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]  
Crowder MJ, 2001, Classical competing risks
[6]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[7]  
Geskus RB, 2016, Data Analysis with Competing Risks and Intermediate States
[8]   Statistical controversies in clinical research: the importance of importance [J].
Gleiss, A. ;
Zeillinger, R. ;
Braicu, E. I. ;
Trillsch, F. ;
Vergote, I. ;
Schemper, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (07) :1185-1189
[9]   Degrees of necessity and of sufficiency: Further results and extensions, with an application to covid-19 mortality in Austria [J].
Gleiss, Andreas ;
Henderson, Robin ;
Schemper, Michael .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (14) :3352-3366
[10]   Quantifying degrees of necessity and of sufficiency in cause-effect relationships with dichotomous and survival outcomes [J].
Gleiss, Andreas ;
Schemper, Michael .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (23) :4733-4748