Predicting meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using physics-based machine learning

被引:20
作者
Riensche, Alex R. [1 ]
Bevans, Benjamin D. [1 ]
King, Grant [2 ]
Krishnan, Ajay [3 ]
Cole, Kevin D. [2 ]
Rao, Prahalada [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Grad Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Mech & Mat Engn, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] Edison Welding Inst, Addit Mfg, Columbus, OH USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Laser powder bed fusion; Microstructural evolution; Primary dendritic arm spacing (PDAS); Meltpool depth; Thermal modeling; Physics-based machine learning; MICROSTRUCTURE EVOLUTION; QUALIFICATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112540
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The long-term goal of this work is to predict and control the microstructure evolution in metal additive manufacturing processes. In pursuit of this goal, we developed and applied an approach which combines physicsbased thermal modeling with machine learning to predict two important microstructure-related characteristics, namely, the meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing in Nickel Alloy 718 parts made using the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. Microstructure characteristics are critical determinants of functional physical properties, e.g., yield strength and fatigue life. Currently, the microstructure of LPBF parts is optimized through a cumbersome build-and-characterize empirical approach. Rapid and accurate models for predicting microstructure evolution are therefore valuable to reduce process development time and achieve consistent properties. However, owing to their computational complexity, existing physics-based models for predicting the microstructure evolution are limited to a few layers, and are challenging to scale to practical parts. This paper addresses the aforementioned research gap via a novel physics and data integrated modeling approach. The approach consists of two steps. First, a rapid, part-level computational thermal model was used to predict the temperature distribution and cooling rate in the entire part before it was printed. Second, the foregoing physicsbased thermal history quantifiers were used as inputs to a simple machine learning model (support vector machine) trained to predict the meltpool depth and primary dendritic arm spacing based on empirical materials characterization data. As an example of its efficacy, when tested on a separate set of samples from a different build, the approach predicted the primary dendritic arm spacing with root mean squared error approximate to 110 nm. This work thus presents an avenue for future physics-based optimization and control of microstructure evolution in LPBF.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 100 条
[51]  
Najmon J.C., 2019, Additive Manufacturing for the Aerospace Industry, P7, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814062-8.00002-9
[52]   A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends [J].
Narasimharaju, Shubhavardhan Ramadurga ;
Zeng, Wenhan ;
See, Tian Long ;
Zhu, Zicheng ;
Scott, Paul ;
, Xiangqian Jiang ;
Lou, Shan .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 75 :375-414
[53]  
NASA, 2017, MSFC-SPEC-3717-Specification for control and qualification of laser powder bed fusion metallurgical processes
[54]   Processing parameters in laser powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing [J].
Oliveira, J. P. ;
LaLonde, A. D. ;
Ma, J. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 193
[55]   Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: From theory to practice [J].
Oliveira, J. P. ;
Santos, T. G. ;
Miranda, R. M. .
PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2020, 107
[56]   Deep learning-based monitoring of laser powder bed fusion process on variable time-scales using heterogeneous sensing and operando X-ray radiography guidance [J].
Pandiyan, Vigneashwara ;
Masinelli, Giulio ;
Claire, Navarre ;
Tri Le-Quang ;
Hamidi-Nasab, Milad ;
de Formanoir, Charlotte ;
Esmaeilzadeh, Reza ;
Goel, Sneha ;
Marone, Federica ;
Loge, Roland ;
Van Petegem, Steven ;
Wasmer, Kilian .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 58
[57]   Computer simulation of microstructure development in powder-bed additive manufacturing with crystallographic texture [J].
Pauza, J. G. ;
Tayon, W. A. ;
Rollett, A. D. .
MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 29 (05)
[58]   Benchmarking build simulation software for laser powder bed fusion of metals [J].
Peter, Noha ;
Pitts, Zachary ;
Thompson, Spencer ;
Saharan, Ankit .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
[59]   Localized melt-scan strategy for site specific control of grain size and primary dendrite arm spacing in electron beam additive manufacturing [J].
Raghavan, Narendran ;
Simunovic, Srdjan ;
Dehoff, Ryan ;
Plotkowski, Alex ;
Turner, John ;
Kirka, Michael ;
Babu, Suresh .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2017, 140 :375-387
[60]   Incorporation of machine learning in additive manufacturing: a review [J].
Raza, Ali ;
Deen, Kashif Mairaj ;
Jaafreh, Russlan ;
Hamad, Kotiba ;
Haider, Ali ;
Haider, Waseem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 122 (3-4) :1143-1166