A Discrete Choice Analysis Comparing COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions for Children and Adults

被引:7
作者
Prosser, Lisa A. [1 ]
Wagner, Abram L. [1 ]
Wittenberg, Eve [2 ]
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. [1 ]
Rose, Angela M. [1 ]
Pike, Jamison [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Harvard Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
PRACTICES INTERIM RECOMMENDATION; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE; UNITED-STATES; VALUING HEALTH; PREFERENCES; HESITANCY;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE COVID-19 vaccination rates in the US remain below optimal levels. Patient preferences for different attributes of vaccine products and the vaccination experience can be important in determining vaccine uptake decisions. OBJECTIVE To assess preferences for attributes of adult and pediatric COVID-19 vaccination among US adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An online survey of a national panel of 1040 US adults was conducted in May and June 2021. A discrete choice analysis was used to measure the relative value of each attribute in the decision to choose a COVID-19 vaccination option for adults or children. Six attributes were used to described hypothetical vaccination options: vaccine effectiveness, mild side effects, rare adverse events, number of doses, time required for vaccination, and regulatory approval. Respondents chose between hypothetical vaccination profiles or no vaccination. Additional survey questions asked about vaccination beliefs, COVID-19 illness experience, COVID-19 risk factors, vaccination status, and opinions about the risk of COVID-19. EXPOSURES Respondents chose which vaccine profile they would prefer to receive for themselves (or no vaccination). Respondents then considered an identical set of profiles for a hypothetical child aged 0 to 17 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Relative value of vaccination-related attributes were estimated using Bayesian logit regression. Preference profiles for subgroups were estimated using latent class analyses. RESULTS A total of 1040 adults (610 [59%] female; 379 participants [36%] with an age of 55 years and older years) responded to the survey. When asked about vaccination choices for themselves, participants indicated that vaccine effectiveness (95% vs 60%) was a significant attribute (beta, 9.59 [95% CrI, 9.20-10.00] vs beta, 0.41 [95% CrI, 0-0.80]). Respondents also preferred fewer rare adverse events (beta, 6.35 [95% CrI, 5.74-6.86), fewer mild side effects (beta, 5.49; 95% CrI, 5.12-5.87), 1 dose (beta, 5.41; 95% CrI, 5.04-5.78), FDA approval (beta, 6.01; 95% CrI, 5.64-6.41), and shorter waiting times (beta, 5.67; 95% CrI, 4.87-6.48). Results were very similar when framing the question as adult or child vaccination, with slightly stronger preference for fewer rare adverse events for children. Latent class analysis revealed 4 groups of respondents: (1) individuals sensitive to safety and regulatory status, (2) individuals sensitive to convenience, (3) individuals who carefully considered all attributes in making their choices, and (4) individuals who rejected the vaccine. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this survey study of US adults, the identification of 4 distinct preference groups provides new information to guide communications to support vaccine decision making. In particular, the group that prioritize convenience (less time required for vaccination and fewer doses) may present an opportunity to create actionable strategies to increase vaccination uptake for both adult and pediatric populations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2021, TRANSP IN DISCL EL
  • [2] American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2022, AAPOR STAND BEST PRA
  • [3] [Anonymous], STAT ABSTR US 2022
  • [4] Effects coding in discrete choice experiments
    Bech, M
    Gyrd-Hansen, D
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (10) : 1079 - 1083
  • [5] Preferences for a COVID-19 vaccine in Australia
    Borriello, Antonio
    Master, Daniel
    Pellegrini, Andrea
    Rose, John M.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2021, 39 (03) : 473 - 479
  • [6] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [7] The impact of flavors, health risks, secondhand smoke and prices on young adults' cigarette and e-cigarette choices: a discrete choice experiment
    Buckell, John
    Sindelar, Jody L.
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2019, 114 (08) : 1427 - 1435
  • [8] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, COVID-19 vaccination and case trends by age group, United States
  • [9] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, COVID DAT TRACK
  • [10] United States COVID-19 Vaccination Preferences (CVP): 2020 Hindsight
    Craig, Benjamin Matthew
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (03) : 309 - 318