Effect of current direction and muscle activation on motor cortex neuroplasticity induced by repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:2
|
作者
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
motor-evoked potential; plasticity; primary motor cortex; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; PLASTICITY; VOLLEYS; FREQUENCY; CIRCUITS; FORM; TMS;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.16099
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at indirect (I)-wave periodicity (iTMS) can increase plasticity in primary motor cortex (M1). Both TMS coil orientation and muscle activation can influence I-wave activity, but it remains unclear how these factors influence M1 plasticity with iTMS. We therefore investigated the influence of TMS coil orientation and muscle activation on the response to iTMS. Thirty-two young adults (24.2 & PLUSMN; 4.8 years) participated in three experiments. Each experiment included two sessions using a modified iTMS intervention with either a posterior-anterior orientation (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) coil orientation over M1. Stimulation was applied in resting (Experiments 1 and 3) or active muscle (Experiments 2 and 3). Effects of iTMS on M1 excitability were assessed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) with PA and AP orientations in both resting (all experiments) and active (Experiment 2) muscle. For the resting intervention, MEPs were greater after AP iTMS (Experiment 1, P = .046), whereas SICF was comparable between interventions (all P > .10). For the active intervention, responses did not vary between PA and AP iTMS (Experiment 2, all P > .14), and muscle activation reduced the effect of AP iTMS during the intervention (Experiment 3, P = .002). Coil orientation influenced the MEP response after iTMS, and muscle activation reduced the response during iTMS. While this suggests that AP iTMS may be beneficial in producing a neuroplastic modulation of I-wave circuits in resting muscle, further exploration of factors such as dosing is required.
引用
收藏
页码:3270 / 3285
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PAIRED-PULSE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX DIFFERENTIALLY MODULATES PERCEPTION AND SENSORIMOTOR TRANSFORMATIONS
    Meehan, S. K.
    Legon, W.
    Staines, W. R.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 157 (02) : 424 - 431
  • [32] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex for hemichorea
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    Dileone, M.
    Pilato, F.
    Contarino, M.-F.
    Musumeci, G.
    Bentivoglio, A. R.
    Tonali, P. A.
    Rothwell, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 77 (09): : 1095 - 1097
  • [33] Investigating the Effects of Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuomotor Training Using TMS-EEG
    Sasaki, Ryoki
    Hand, Brodie J.
    Liao, Wei-Yeh
    Semmler, John G.
    Opie, George M.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2024, 37 (06) : 1158 - 1170
  • [34] Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation affects corticospinal excitability and finger tapping in Parkinson's disease
    Sommer, M
    Kamm, T
    Tergau, F
    Ulm, G
    Paulus, W
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (06) : 944 - 950
  • [35] Strength-Duration Relationship in Paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Its Implications for Repetitive TMS
    Shirota, Yuichiro
    Sommer, Martin
    Paulus, Walter
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 755 - 761
  • [36] Pulse Duration as Well as Current Direction Determines the Specificity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Motor Cortex during Contraction
    Hannah, Ricci
    Rothwell, John C.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2017, 10 (01) : 106 - 115
  • [37] Reliability of single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for the assessment of knee extensor muscle function
    Temesi, John
    Ly, Sandy N.
    Millet, Guillaume Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 375 : 442 - 449
  • [38] Measures of Cortical Inhibition by Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Anesthetized Rats
    Vahabzadeh-Hagh, Andrew M.
    Muller, Paul A.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Jensen, Frances E.
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 105 (02) : 615 - 624
  • [39] Investigation of the primary visual cortex using short-interval paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
    Sparing, R
    Dambeck, N
    Stock, K
    Meister, IG
    Huetter, D
    Boroojerdi, B
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2005, 382 (03) : 312 - 316
  • [40] Transcranial direct current stimulation preconditioning modulates the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the human motor cortex
    Cosentino, Giuseppe
    Fierro, Brigida
    Paladino, Piera
    Talamanca, Simona
    Vigneri, Simone
    Palermo, Antonio
    Giglia, Giuseppe
    Brighina, Filippo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 35 (01) : 119 - 124