Effect of current direction and muscle activation on motor cortex neuroplasticity induced by repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:2
|
作者
Sasaki, Ryoki [1 ]
Liao, Wei-Yeh [1 ]
Opie, George M. [1 ]
Semmler, John G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
motor-evoked potential; plasticity; primary motor cortex; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; PLASTICITY; VOLLEYS; FREQUENCY; CIRCUITS; FORM; TMS;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.16099
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at indirect (I)-wave periodicity (iTMS) can increase plasticity in primary motor cortex (M1). Both TMS coil orientation and muscle activation can influence I-wave activity, but it remains unclear how these factors influence M1 plasticity with iTMS. We therefore investigated the influence of TMS coil orientation and muscle activation on the response to iTMS. Thirty-two young adults (24.2 & PLUSMN; 4.8 years) participated in three experiments. Each experiment included two sessions using a modified iTMS intervention with either a posterior-anterior orientation (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP) coil orientation over M1. Stimulation was applied in resting (Experiments 1 and 3) or active muscle (Experiments 2 and 3). Effects of iTMS on M1 excitability were assessed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) with PA and AP orientations in both resting (all experiments) and active (Experiment 2) muscle. For the resting intervention, MEPs were greater after AP iTMS (Experiment 1, P = .046), whereas SICF was comparable between interventions (all P > .10). For the active intervention, responses did not vary between PA and AP iTMS (Experiment 2, all P > .14), and muscle activation reduced the effect of AP iTMS during the intervention (Experiment 3, P = .002). Coil orientation influenced the MEP response after iTMS, and muscle activation reduced the response during iTMS. While this suggests that AP iTMS may be beneficial in producing a neuroplastic modulation of I-wave circuits in resting muscle, further exploration of factors such as dosing is required.
引用
收藏
页码:3270 / 3285
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A specific phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation at the β frequency boosts repetitive paired-pulse TMS-induced plasticity
    Hisato Nakazono
    Katsuya Ogata
    Akinori Takeda
    Emi Yamada
    Shinichiro Oka
    Shozo Tobimatsu
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [22] Plastic changes in human motor cortex induced by repetitive Aδ laser inputs paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Suppa, A.
    Biasiotta, A.
    Belvisi, D.
    Marsili, L.
    La Cesa, S. I.
    Truini, A. I.
    Cruccu, G.
    Berardelli, A.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2010, 25 (07) : S222 - S222
  • [23] Modulation of I-Wave Generating Pathways With Repetitive Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Study
    Sasaki, Ryoki
    Hand, Brodie J.
    Semmler, John G.
    Opie, George M.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (04): : 755 - 766
  • [24] Paired-pulse magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: differences among I waves
    Hanajima, R
    Ugawa, Y
    Terao, Y
    Sakai, K
    Furubayashi, T
    Machii, K
    Kanazawa, I
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1998, 509 (02): : 607 - 618
  • [25] Direct demonstration of the effects of repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation at I-wave periodicity
    Di Lazzaro, V.
    Thickbroom, G. W.
    Pilato, F.
    Profice, P.
    Dileone, M.
    Mazzone, P.
    Insola, A.
    Ranieri, F.
    Tonali, P. A.
    Rothwell, J. C.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (06) : 1193 - 1197
  • [26] Facilitatory effect of paired-pulse stimulation by transcranial magnetic stimulation with biphasic wave-form
    Julkunen, Petro
    Jarnefelt, Gustaf
    Savolainen, Petri
    Laine, Jarmo
    Karhu, Jari
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2016, 38 (08) : 813 - 817
  • [27] Origin of facilitation in repetitive, 1.5 ms interval, paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (rPPS) of the human motor cortex
    Hamada, Masashi
    Hanajima, Ritsuko
    Terao, Yasuo
    Arai, Noritoshi
    Furubayashi, Toshiaki
    Inomata-Terada, Satomi
    Yugeta, Akihiro
    Matsumoto, Hideyuki
    Shirota, Yuichiro
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (07) : 1596 - 1601
  • [28] Functional Connectivity at Rest between the Human Medial Posterior Parietal Cortex and the Primary Motor Cortex Detected by Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Breveglieri, Rossella
    Borgomaneri, Sara
    Filippini, Matteo
    De Vitis, Marina
    Tessari, Alessia
    Fattori, Patrizia
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (10)
  • [29] Caffeine and cortical excitability, as measured with paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Strunge, Kristine
    Bostock, Hugh
    Howells, James
    Cengiz, Bulent
    Samusyte, Gintaute
    Koltzenburg, Martin
    Tankisi, Hatice
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2024, 69 (02) : 206 - 212
  • [30] The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in full and divided encoding: A paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study
    Blanchet, Sophie
    Gagnon, Genevieve
    Schneider, Cyril
    BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY, 2010, 23 (03) : 107 - 115