Shear bond strength of adhesive precoated brackets: A comparative in vitro study

被引:3
作者
Miller, Mary [1 ]
Mon, Htwe H. [2 ]
Xu, Xiaoming [2 ]
Chapple, Andrew [3 ]
Dupree, Peter [4 ]
Ballard, Richard W. [1 ]
Armbruster, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, 1100 Florida Ave, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[2] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 1100 Florida Ave, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[3] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, 2020 Gravier St, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[4] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Dent, Dept Comprehens Dent, 1100 Florida Ave, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
关键词
Shear bond strength; Adhesives; Adhesive precoated; brackets; Orthodontic brackets; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100752
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective > This study compared the shear bond strength of orthodontic precoated brackets from different manufacturers. Methods > Sixty extracted human premolar teeth were divided into six groups (n = 10). The groups were bonded with one of the following brackets: 3MTM Unitek VictoryTM SeriesTM with APC, 3MTM Unitek ClarityTM Advanced CeramicTM with APC, TP Nu-Edge (R) NX Cobalt-Chromium and TP In-Vu (R) ceramic Readi-Base (R) both with eXact (R) orthodontic adhesive, 3MTM Unitek Clarity Advanced CeramicTM and 3MTM Unitek VictoryTM SeriesTM both with TransbondTM XT Adhesive. Each group was tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. Each sample was observed under a dissecting microscope and received an adhesive remnant index (ARI) score. Statistical analysis was performed using Tukey's Standardized Range (HSD) Test to make comparisons among all groups and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to evaluate for pairwise comparisons between the groups. The P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results > The ceramic control was not statistically different from the metal control, 3MTM VictoryTM APCTM, TP In-Vu (R) ceramic eXact (R) or TP Nu-EDGE (R) eXact (R) in terms of shear bond strength (7.69 +/- 1.41 MPa, 7.72 +/- 1.25 MPa, 8.70 +/- 1.93 MPa, 4.90 +/- 1.76 MPa, 5.33 +/- 0.78 MPa, respec-tively). However, it was statistically different from 3MTM Ceramic APCTM (10.29 +/- 2.78 MPa). In terms of modulus, there were no statistical differences. TP's Nu-edge (R) had the lowest average ARI score, but was not statistically different when compared to the other groups. Conclusion > 3MTM Unitek's Ceramic APC had a statistically higher SBS than the non-precoated brackets and TP Orthodontics' precoated brackets. However, all SBS were 4.9 MPA or above, which is deemed clinically acceptable in terms of laboratory forces. There was no statistical difference between manufacturing companies or precoated vs. non-precoated modulus and ARI scores.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to a new version of zirconium all ceramic restoration: An in vitro comparative study
    Abd EL-wahab, Assem
    Shamaa, Marwa
    Hafez, Ahmed
    El-Wassefy, Noha
    Hammad, Shaza
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [32] AN IN VITRO COMPARISION OF BOND STRENGTH OF PRECOATED AND UNCOATED BRACKETS USING SELF ETCHING PRIMER
    Roy, Debojyoti
    Goswami, Arunima
    Chokotiya, Heeralal
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 1313 - 1319
  • [33] Comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of recycled ceramic brackets using three methods: An in vitro study
    Yousef, Mohamed E.
    Marzouk, Eiman S.
    Ismail, Hanan A.
    Aboushelib, Moustafa N.
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2016, 5 (03) : 87 - 93
  • [34] Effects of tooth bleaching on shear bond strength of brackets rebonded with a self-etching adhesive system
    Abe, Ryota
    Endo, Toshiya
    Shimooka, Shohachi
    ODONTOLOGY, 2011, 99 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [35] Effect of adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new brackets bonded to a debonded tooth surface - An In vitro study
    Madaparambil, Vidya
    Antony, Vincy
    Menon, Vineeth
    Nayaz, Mohamed
    Jasim, Gazanafer Roshan Mohamed
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2020, 11 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [36] The influence of adhesives and the base structure of metal brackets on shear bond strength
    Reimann, Susanne
    Mezey, Judith
    Daratsianos, Nikolaos
    Jaeger, Andreas
    Bourauel, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2012, 73 (03): : 184 - 193
  • [37] Comparison of the shear bond strength of new and recycled metallic brackets using different adhesive materials. An in vitro study
    Ibarra, R. Nicole
    Saez, Mackarena
    Rojas, Victor
    Oyonarte, Rodrigo
    EUROPEAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2023, 57 (02) : 96 - 102
  • [38] Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An In Vitro Study
    Sokucu, Oral
    Yesildal, Seher
    Oksayan, Ridvan
    Simsek, Irfan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (01) : 6 - 9
  • [39] Effect of Ethyl Alcohol Wet Bonding on Shear Bond Strength in Orthodontic Brackets - An In vitro Study
    Sivakumar, Nishanth
    Srinivasan, Dilip
    Chakravarthi, Sushil
    Kannan, Ravi
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S377 - S382
  • [40] Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to a new all-ceramic crown composed of lithium silicate infused with zirconia: An in vitro comparative study
    Gardiner, Ryan
    Ballard, Richard
    Yu, Qingzhao
    Kee, Edwin
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Armbruster, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 17 (04) : 726 - 732