Shear bond strength of adhesive precoated brackets: A comparative in vitro study

被引:3
作者
Miller, Mary [1 ]
Mon, Htwe H. [2 ]
Xu, Xiaoming [2 ]
Chapple, Andrew [3 ]
Dupree, Peter [4 ]
Ballard, Richard W. [1 ]
Armbruster, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, 1100 Florida Ave, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[2] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 1100 Florida Ave, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[3] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, 2020 Gravier St, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[4] LSU Hlth New Orleans, Sch Dent, Dept Comprehens Dent, 1100 Florida Ave, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
关键词
Shear bond strength; Adhesives; Adhesive precoated; brackets; Orthodontic brackets; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100752
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective > This study compared the shear bond strength of orthodontic precoated brackets from different manufacturers. Methods > Sixty extracted human premolar teeth were divided into six groups (n = 10). The groups were bonded with one of the following brackets: 3MTM Unitek VictoryTM SeriesTM with APC, 3MTM Unitek ClarityTM Advanced CeramicTM with APC, TP Nu-Edge (R) NX Cobalt-Chromium and TP In-Vu (R) ceramic Readi-Base (R) both with eXact (R) orthodontic adhesive, 3MTM Unitek Clarity Advanced CeramicTM and 3MTM Unitek VictoryTM SeriesTM both with TransbondTM XT Adhesive. Each group was tested for shear bond strength using a universal testing machine. Each sample was observed under a dissecting microscope and received an adhesive remnant index (ARI) score. Statistical analysis was performed using Tukey's Standardized Range (HSD) Test to make comparisons among all groups and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to evaluate for pairwise comparisons between the groups. The P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results > The ceramic control was not statistically different from the metal control, 3MTM VictoryTM APCTM, TP In-Vu (R) ceramic eXact (R) or TP Nu-EDGE (R) eXact (R) in terms of shear bond strength (7.69 +/- 1.41 MPa, 7.72 +/- 1.25 MPa, 8.70 +/- 1.93 MPa, 4.90 +/- 1.76 MPa, 5.33 +/- 0.78 MPa, respec-tively). However, it was statistically different from 3MTM Ceramic APCTM (10.29 +/- 2.78 MPa). In terms of modulus, there were no statistical differences. TP's Nu-edge (R) had the lowest average ARI score, but was not statistically different when compared to the other groups. Conclusion > 3MTM Unitek's Ceramic APC had a statistically higher SBS than the non-precoated brackets and TP Orthodontics' precoated brackets. However, all SBS were 4.9 MPA or above, which is deemed clinically acceptable in terms of laboratory forces. There was no statistical difference between manufacturing companies or precoated vs. non-precoated modulus and ARI scores.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Different Adhesives
    Singh, Deepak
    Swarup, Divya
    Kumari, Neha
    Kumar, Subhash
    Priya, Tanu
    Sinha, Ritama
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S974 - S976
  • [22] Shear bond strength of rebonded ceramic brackets
    Sung, Ji-Young
    Kang, Kyung-Hwa
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 39 (04) : 234 - 247
  • [23] Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials
    Ebert, Thomas
    Elsner, Laura
    Hirschfelder, Ursula
    Hanke, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2016, 77 (02): : 73 - 84
  • [24] Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets
    Mirzakouchaki, Behnam
    Kimyai, Soodabeh
    Hydari, Mahboubeh
    Shahrbaf, Shirin
    Mirzakouchaki-Boroujeni, Parvin
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2012, 17 (01): : E164 - E170
  • [25] Shear bond strength of brackets to demineralize enamel after different pretreatment methods
    Attin, Rengin
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    Kecik, Defne
    Knoesel, Michael
    Wiechmann, Dirk
    Attin, Thomas
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [26] SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF BRACKETS BONDED TO PORCELAIN SURFACE: IN VITRO STUDY
    Alakus Sabuncuoglu, Fidan
    Erturk, Ergul
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 50 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [27] Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to single-shade composite surfaces: An in-vitro comparative study of different surface preparations
    Rathel, Hayden
    Dupree, Peter
    Mon, Htwe
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Chapple, Andrew
    Armbruster, Paul
    Ballard, Richard W.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 22 (03)
  • [28] Bond strength of pre-coated flash-free adhesive ceramic brackets. An in vitro comparative study on the second mandibular premolars
    Marc, Maria-Gabriela
    Bazert, Cedric
    Attal, Jean-Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 16 (03) : 425 - 439
  • [29] An in vitro study of orthodontic brackets bonded to transition dental zirconia: Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and surface irregularities
    Roberts, Gabrielle
    Xu, Xiaoming
    Kee, Edwin
    Chapple, Andrew
    Bartels, Virgil
    Armbruster, Paul
    Ballard, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [30] Does the antioxidant treatment affect the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study
    Alrafaa, Abeer Abdullah
    Bilal, Rabia
    Alshahrani, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 69 (01) : 82 - 86