Are plant-based meat analogues fulfilling their potentials? An Australian perspective

被引:12
作者
Miller, Owen [1 ]
Scarlett, Christopher J. [1 ]
Adhikari, Benu [2 ]
Akanbi, Taiwo O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle UON, Coll Engn Sci & Environm, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Brush Rd, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3083, Australia
来源
FUTURE FOODS | 2024年 / 9卷
关键词
Plant -based meat analogue (PBMA); Australia; Healthiness; Sustainability; Plant protein; PISUM-SATIVUM PROTEIN; SOY PROTEIN; PEA; CONSUMPTION; CHALLENGES; PRODUCTS; FOOD; MALTODEXTRIN; ALTERNATIVES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100305
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The plant-based meat analogue (PBMA) market in Australia is growing, as it is globally, based on the potential of the products' healthiness and sustainability. The potential of current commercially available PBMAs in Australia is assessed based on healthiness and sustainability followed by a comparison of the plant proteins which have demonstrated desirable functionality with those used in commercially available PBMAs. Robust evidence supports the sustainability claims of PBMAs over meat products. Regarding healthiness, on a macro scale, there is nutritional equivalence; however, on a micro scale, most commercial PBMAs lack essential minerals and vitamins (such as iron and vitamin B12). There is a low diversity of plant proteins used in commercial PBMAs, which is a poor representation of the numerous plant proteins within the scientific literature. This review highlights the likely reasons limiting the diversity of plant proteins used in commercially available PBMAs in Australia and provides insights into how these products can fulfil their potential regarding their sustainability and healthiness.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   Association between total, processed, red and white meat consumption and all-cause, CVD and IHD mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies [J].
Abete, Itziar ;
Romaguera, Dora ;
Vieira, Ana Rita ;
Lopez de Munain, Adolfo ;
Norat, Teresa .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2014, 112 (05) :762-775
[2]   Electrospun fibers from blends of pea (Pisum sativum) protein and pullulan [J].
Aguilar-Vazquez, G. ;
Loarca-Pina, G. ;
Figueroa-Cardenas, J. D. ;
Mendoza, S. .
FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2018, 83 :173-181
[3]   The next protein transition [J].
Aiking, Harry ;
de Boer, Joop .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 105 (105) :515-522
[4]   Candida antarctica lipase A effectively concentrates DHA from fish and thraustochytrid oils [J].
Akanbi, Taiwo O. ;
Barrow, Colin J. .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2017, 229 :509-516
[5]   Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Meat Products Available in the UK: A Cross-Sectional Survey [J].
Alessandrini, Roberta ;
Brown, Mhairi K. ;
Pombo-Rodrigues, Sonia ;
Bhageerutty, Sheena ;
He, Feng J. ;
MacGregor, Graham A. .
NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (12)
[6]   Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use? [J].
Alexander, Peter ;
Brown, Calum ;
Arneth, Almut ;
Dias, Clare ;
Finnigan, John ;
Moran, Dominic ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 :22-32
[7]   Methods for Physically Structuring Meat Analogs: Challenges and Perspectives [J].
Angonese, Mariana ;
Sa, Amanda G. A. ;
Motta, Gabriel Emiliano ;
de Oliveira, Debora ;
Di Luccio, Marco ;
Carciofi, Bruno A. M. .
FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 39 (09) :6805-6833
[8]   Perspectives on preserving lipid quality and strategies for value enhancement [J].
Aryee, Alberta N. A. ;
Akanbi, Taiwo O. ;
Nwachukwu, Ifeanyi D. ;
Gunathilake, Tharuka .
CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2022, 44
[9]   Textured vegetable proteins (TVP): Future foods standing on their merits as meat alternatives [J].
Baune, Marie-Christin ;
Terjung, Nino ;
Tulbek, Mehmet Caglar ;
Boukid, Fatma .
FUTURE FOODS, 2022, 6
[10]   Meat analogs: Protein restructuring during thermomechanical processing [J].
Beniwal, Akashdeep Singh ;
Singh, Jaspreet ;
Kaur, Lovedeep ;
Hardacre, Allan ;
Singh, Harjinder .
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2021, 20 (02) :1221-1249