First and final farewells, disrupted family connections and loss: A collective case study exploring the impact of COVID-19 visitor restrictions in critical care

被引:8
作者
Bloomer, Melissa J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yuen, Eva [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Williams, Ruth [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hutchinson, Alison M. [4 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Queensland Hlth, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Hlth, Monash Hlth Partnership, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Assessment & Evaluat Res Ctr, Melbourne Grad Sch Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Barwon Hlth, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Barwon Hlth Partnership, Geelong, Vic, Australia
关键词
Bereavement; COVID-19; Critical care; Death; Dying; Family -centred care; Grief; Intensive care; Pandemic; OF-LIFE CARE; TASK-FORCE; DEATH; UNIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103534
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Patient and family-centred care is considered best practice. Such an approach is associated with high quality and positive experiences of care, and family presence at the bedside is encouraged and enabled. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, resulted in strictly enforced restrictions on hospital visitation, which threatened health professionals' ability to provide family-centred care.Aim: To explore the impact of COVID-19 visitor restrictions on family relationships during critical illness at the end of life in the intensive care unit.Design: A retrospective collective case study approach was taken, using semi-structured interviews, conducted via telephone or Zoom, in accordance with COVID-19 restrictions. Setting/participants: Two participant groups, bereaved next-of-kin of patients who died in the intensive care unit (n = 6) and critical care nurses (n = 3) from a major metropolitan hospital were included.Findings: Interviews with bereaved next-of-kin lasted 25-59 (mean = 41) minutes, and critical care nurse in-terviews lasted 31-52 (mean = 43) minutes. Inductive content analysis revealed five themes: (i) the first farewell, the significance not realised at the time; (ii) confusing rules and restrictions, which emphasised physical and created emotional barriers to family connections; (iii) inadequate communication, which further impacted next-of -kin; (iv) final farewells, which were rushed, emotional and afforded no privacy; and (v) reflecting back.Conclusions: This collective case study demonstrates the profound impact visitor restrictions have had on bereaved next-of-kin and the wider family. A family-centred approach to care, protecting and prioritising family connection, and recognising the patient as a person who is part of a larger family unit must be emphasised. Implications for clinical practice: Critical care teams must consider their own approach to end-of-life care during times of visitor restrictions, finding new, flexible and innovative ways to improve communication, promote family-centred care, maintain the patient-family connection and facilitate end-of-life cultural customs, and rit-uals imperative to next-of-kin and the wider family unit.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The four domains of the person-centred practice framework from the perspective of critical care nurses in intensive care units during a pandemic [J].
Andersson, Maria ;
Nordin, Anna ;
Fredholm, Angelica ;
Engstrom, Asa .
INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 78
[2]   Paved With Good Intentions: Hospital Visitation Restrictions in the Age of Coronavirus Disease 2019* [J].
Andrist, Erica ;
Clarke, Rachel G. ;
Harding, Meghan .
PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (10) :E924-E926
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ZOOM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: Interim Report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NATL STATEMENT ETHIC
[6]   Patients' perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness: An interview study [J].
Bench, Suzanne ;
Cherry, Helen ;
Hodson, Matthew ;
James, Alison ;
McGuinness, Nicola ;
Parker, Gaby ;
Thomas, Nicola .
NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 28 (04) :585-595
[7]   Perspectives of family-centred care at the end of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study [J].
Bloomer, Melissa J. ;
Yuen, Eva ;
Williams, Ruth ;
Bouchoucha, Stephane ;
Poon, Peter ;
Runacres, Fiona ;
Mooney, Christine ;
Hutchinson, Alison M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (15-16) :5173-5184
[8]   Family-centred care at end of life in critical care: A retrospective descriptive study [J].
Bloomer, Melissa J. ;
Poon, Peter ;
Runacres, Fiona ;
Hutchinson, Alison M. .
COLLEGIAN, 2022, 29 (05) :574-580
[9]   A national Position Statement on adult end-of-life care in critical care [J].
Bloomer, Melissa J. ;
Ranse, Kristen ;
Butler, Ashleigh ;
Brooks, Laura .
AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 (04) :480-487
[10]   Australian College of Critical Care Nurses and Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control position statement on facilitating next-of-kin presence for patients dying from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the intensive care unit [J].
Bloomer, Melissa J. ;
Bouchoucha, Stephane .
AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 34 (02) :132-134