A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Evaluating Web-Based E-Learning Platforms

被引:4
作者
Youssef, Ahmed E. [1 ]
Saleem, Kashif [2 ]
机构
[1] Helwan Univ, Fac Engn Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Studies & Community Serv, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia
关键词
E-learning; online learning; web-based e-learning; multi-criteria decision-making; best worst method; simple additive weighting; Delphi; analytical hierarchy process; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; BEST-WORST METHOD; MULTIMOORA; SELECTION; TOPSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294798
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The outbreak of COVID-19 has promoted distance learning and rapidly increased the usage of online learning platforms. As a result, more and more IT companies are competing to offer high-quality Web-based E-Learning Platforms (WELPs). However, the problem facing educational institutions is how to evaluate the quality of WELPs to choose the one that best fulfills their needs. In order to select the most appropriate WELP among different alternatives, many evaluation criteria must be considered by the Decision Maker (DM). Hence, evaluating WELPs is a complex Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem that needs to be addressed efficiently. In literature, we have noticed that MCDM methods are rarely used for evaluating WELPs. In addition, traditional MCDM methods suffer from additive complexity and inconsistency due to the numerous pairwise comparisons of criteria. In contrast, Hybrid MCDM (HMCDM is a promising and more efficient decision-support tool. In this paper, we propose a HMCDM approach for evaluating and ranking WELPs which is more efficient and more reliable than traditional approaches. The proposed approach incorporates different techniques (i.e., BWM, SAW, and Delphi) and comprises the following three phases: 1) a Hierarchical Structure Quality Model (HSQM) is defined in which the evaluation criteria are identified; 2) a Criteria Preference Structure (CPS) is developed where the criteria identified in HSQM are weighted using the pairwise comparison Best-Worst Method (BWM); 3) the performance of alternative WELPs w.r.t criteria is estimated and integrated with the CPS using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to determine their ranking. The widely used consensus method, Delphi, has been utilized in phases 2 and 3 to estimate the relative preferences of the criteria and the scores of alternatives over these criteria. The proposed approach has been validated and compared to the widely accepted MCDM method, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results revealed that the proposed approach surpasses AHP.
引用
收藏
页码:72436 / 72447
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college [J].
Abbasi, Sahar ;
Ayoob, Tahera ;
Malik, Abdul ;
Memon, Shabnam Iqbal .
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 36 (04) :S57-S61
[2]  
Ahmad S. A. S., 2017, P 24 NAT S MATH SCI, P27
[3]  
Alinezhad A, 2019, International series in operations research management science, V277
[4]  
Allo M.D. G., 2020, Jurnal Sinestesia, V10, P1
[5]  
Amin F.M.H., 2017, IJCSI, V14, P65, DOI DOI 10.20943/0121703.6569
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, COLL RAND PUBL DELPH
[7]  
Ansah R. H., 2015, Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math, V11, P2403, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2175.6880
[8]  
Armitage JM, 2013, TECHNOLOGIES, INNOVATION, AND CHANGE IN PERSONAL AND VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, P104, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-2467-2.ch009
[9]  
Bana e Costa C. A., 1994, International Transactions in Operational Research, V1, P489
[10]   On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making [J].
Beemsterboer, D. J. C. ;
Hendrix, E. M. T. ;
Claassen, G. D. H. .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11) :1660-1665