Bimodal transit design with heterogeneous demand elasticity under different fare structures

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Jiang, Xinguo [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yusong [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Tao [1 ,4 ]
Jiang, Yu [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Transportat & Logist, Natl Engn Lab Integrated Transportat Big Data Appl, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Univ Technol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Technol Univ, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Inst Syst Sci & Engn, Sch Transportat & Logist, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Univ Management Sch, Lancaster, England
[6] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Transport Div, Lyngby, Denmark
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Public transit; bimodal transit; demand elasticity; profit maximisation; transit fare; NETWORK DESIGN; JOINT OPTIMIZATION; SERVICE FREQUENCY; MONOCENTRIC CITY; BUS SERVICE; ROUTE; SYSTEM; MODEL; LINE; HEADWAY;
D O I
10.1080/23249935.2023.2231091
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The study develops a new optimisation model to design a bimodal transit system from a microeconomic view to maximise the profit of a transit agency considering heterogeneous demand elasticity and different fare structures. Bimodal transit network parameters are optimized to better serve passenger demand. An elastic demand function is devised to include various time components and incorporate flat, distance-based, and hybrid fares. A nested iterative procedure is developed to find a near-optimal solution. Numerical experiments reveal the following interesting findings. First, the increase in elasticity parameters has a knock-on effect on the financial performance, consequently leading to a net profit reduction. Second, a distance-based fare scheme brings in the least actual demand but makes the most profit, compared with the flat and hybrid fare schemes. Third, passengers prefer using a rail-bus system to a BRT-bus system, especially at a higher demand level.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 226
页数:27
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Influence of price elasticity of demand on monopoly games under different returns to scale
    Li, Xiaoliang
    Yang, Jing
    Zhang, Ally Quan
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2025, 233 : 75 - 98
  • [12] Joint Optimization of Zone Area and Headway for Demand Responsive Transit Service under Heterogeneous Environment
    Lin Wang
    Steven Chien
    S. Chan Wirasinghe
    Lina Kattan
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 26 : 3031 - 3042
  • [13] Joint Optimization of Zone Area and Headway for Demand Responsive Transit Service under Heterogeneous Environment
    Wang, Lin
    Chien, Steven
    Wirasinghe, S. Chan
    Kattan, Lina
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (07) : 3031 - 3042
  • [14] How to Improve the Transit Service with Integrated Operational Strategies Considering Emissions under Heterogeneous Demand
    Ma, Jiaxin
    Chen, Xumei
    Han, Xiaomi
    Zhang, Yixin
    Yu, Lei
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 149 (04)
  • [15] Design of Electric Bus Transit Routes with Charging Stations under Demand Uncertainty
    Su, Xiaoqing
    Jiang, Lanqing
    Huang, Yucheng
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (04)
  • [16] Optimal All-Stop, Short-Turn, and Express Transit Services Under Heterogeneous Demand
    Ulusoy, Yavuz Y.
    Chien, Steven I-Jy
    Wei, Chien-Hung
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2197) : 8 - 18
  • [17] Contextual Bandit-Based Sequential Transit Route Design under Demand Uncertainty
    Yoon, Gyugeun
    Chow, Joseph Y. J.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2020, 2674 (05) : 613 - 625
  • [18] Two-phase stochastic program for transit network design under demand uncertainty
    An, Kun
    Lo, Hong K.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2016, 84 : 157 - 181
  • [19] Product Design Competition Under Different Degrees of Demand Ambiguity
    T. Florian Kauffeldt
    Boris R. Wiesenfarth
    Review of Industrial Organization, 2018, 53 : 397 - 420
  • [20] Product Design Competition Under Different Degrees of Demand Ambiguity
    Kauffeldt, T. Florian
    Wiesenfarth, Boris R.
    REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2018, 53 (02) : 397 - 420