A Population Response Model of Ensemble Perception

被引:21
|
作者
Utochkin, Igor S. [1 ,4 ]
Choi, Jeunghwan [2 ]
Chong, Sang Chul [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Inst Mind & Biol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Yonsei Univ, Grad Program Cognit Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Dept Psychol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Chicago, Inst Mind & Biol, 940 E 57th St, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Yonsei Univ, Dept Psychol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ensemble representation; population code; variance effect; set-size effect; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; LIMITED CAPACITY; AREA MT; ORIENTATION; REPRESENTATIONS; MECHANISMS; STATISTICS; DIRECTION; NEURONS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1037/rev0000426
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Ensemble representations have been considered as one of the strategies that the visual system adopts to cope with its limited capacity. Thus, they include various statistical summaries such as mean, variance, and distributional properties and are formed over many stages of visual processing. The present study proposes a population-coding model of ensemble perception to provide a theoretical and computational framework for these various facets of ensemble perception. The proposed model consists of a simple feature layer and a pooling layer. We assumed ensemble representations as population responses in the pooling layer and decoded various statistical properties from population responses. Our model successfully predicted averaging performance in orientation, size, color, and motion direction across different tasks. Furthermore, it predicted variance discrimination performance and the priming effects of feature distributions. Finally, it explained the well-known variance and set-size effects and has a potential for explaining the adaptation and clustering effects.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 57
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing the Flexibility of Ensemble Coding: Limitations in Cross-Modal Ensemble Perception
    Gillies, Greer
    Fukuda, Keisuke
    Cant, Jonathan S.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2024, 153 (01) : 56 - 69
  • [32] A population receptive field model of the magnetoencephalography response
    Kupers, Eline R.
    Edadan, Akhil
    Benson, Noah C.
    Zuiderbaan, Wietske
    de Jong, Maartje C.
    Dumoulin, Serge O.
    Winawer, Jonathan
    NEUROIMAGE, 2021, 244
  • [33] Set size and ensemble perception of numerical value
    Lee, Kassandra R.
    Dague, Taylor D.
    Sobel, Kenith V.
    Paternoster, Nickolas J.
    Puri, Amrita M.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2021, 83 (03) : 1169 - 1178
  • [34] Comparing explicit and implicit ensemble perception: 3 stimulus variables and 3 presentation modes
    Khayat, Noam
    Pavlovskaya, Marina
    Hochstein, Shaul
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (02) : 482 - 502
  • [35] Self-Construal Priming Modulates Ensemble Perception of Multiple-Face Identities
    Peng, Shenli
    Zhang, Ling
    Xu, Runzhou
    Liu, Chang Hong
    Chen, Wenfeng
    Hu, Ping
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [36] Effect of attention on ensemble perception: Comparison between exogenous attention, endogenous attention, and depth
    Li, Binglong
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Ke
    Qian, Jiehui
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (08) : 2604 - 2623
  • [37] Effects of subjective similarity and culture on ensemble perception of faces
    Peng, Shenli
    Liu, Chang Hong
    Hu, Ping
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2021, 83 (03) : 1070 - 1079
  • [38] Context consistency improves ensemble perception of facial expressions
    Lei Jia
    Mengru Cheng
    Jiahao Lu
    Youping Wu
    Jun Wang
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023, 30 : 280 - 290
  • [39] Ensemble perception and focused attention: Two different modes of visual processing to cope with limited capacity
    Baek, Jongsoo
    Chong, Sang Chul
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (04) : 602 - 606
  • [40] On the relation between crowding and ensemble perception: Examining the role of attention
    Lin, Zhen
    Gong, Mingliang
    Li, Xiang
    PSYCH JOURNAL, 2022, 11 (06) : 804 - 813