Labour alternative dispute resolution modes in Zimbabwe

被引:0
作者
Ndhlovu, Pilot [1 ]
Mukuze, Kebiat [1 ]
Ndhlovu, Provilence [2 ]
机构
[1] Midlands State Univ, Fac Social Sci, Human Resource Management, Gweru, Zimbabwe
[2] Mejrkh Commun & Media Advisory, Finance & Adm Dept, Harare, Zimbabwe
关键词
alternative dispute resolution; arbitration; conciliation; collective bargaining; negotiation; Zimbabwe; J50; J52; K31;
D O I
10.1017/elr.2023.26
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The study looks at the defining features of various labour dispute resolution modes and their appropriateness in Zimbabwe. Researchers used a qualitative approach to collect and analyse data, drawing on a purposive sampling method to select and distribute open-ended questionnaires to 38 participants. The study established that the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) modes used in Zimbabwe are collective bargaining, conciliation, and arbitration, all formalised and regulated by the Labour Act (2015). Nevertheless, these ADR mechanisms have numerous flaws including, that they are not 'culturally' close to citizens, and as a result, access to justice is still a challenge, they are also expensive and cannot be easily understood by ordinary employees. Accordingly, the study recommends that the government amend the Labour Act (2015) to return to the old conciliation and arbitration system which was decentralised to the districts. When making the amendments to the Labour Act, the government should also consult with general employees and employers, because they are the victims of the current system. Furthermore, workers' committees and trade unions should also be empowered to support and educate employees.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 571
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ali M, 2016, Brochure on alternative dispute resolution mechanism in modern Indian society
[2]  
Ampeire P., 2017, ADR in South Africa: A Brief Overview
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Labour Act
[4]  
Araujo S., 2020, Comparative Report on Labour Conflicts and Access to Justice: The Impact of Alternative Dispute Resolution: European Union
[5]  
Bingham C, 2016, Spreading the Rule of Law: Mission Impossible.
[6]  
Booysen T. M., 2018, Is Alternative Dispute Resolution All It's Made Out to Be?
[7]  
Brown K, 2021, Intergovernmental Research and Policy Journal.
[8]   How to use and assess qualitative research methods [J].
Busetto, Loraine ;
Wick, Wolfgang ;
Gumbinger, Christoph .
NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (01)
[9]  
Bushe B., 2019, Master of Laws Dissertation
[10]  
Creswell J.W., 2014, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, V4th, P183, DOI DOI 10.5539/ELT.V12N5P40