Impact of Social Reference Cues on Misinformation Sharing on Social Media: Series of Experimental Studies

被引:6
|
作者
Jones, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Diethei, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Schoening, Johannes [2 ,3 ]
Shrestha, Rehana [1 ,2 ]
Jahnel, Tina [1 ,2 ]
Schuez, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Inst Publ Hlth & Nursing Res, Bremen, Germany
[2] Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Publ Hlth, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ St Gallen, Sch Comp Sci, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bremen, Inst Publ Hlth & Nursing Res, Grazer Str 4, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
misinformation; social media; health literacy; COVID-19; fake news; Twitter; tweet; infodemiology; information behavior; information sharing; sharing behavior; behavior change; social cue; social reference; flag; LINEAR GROWTH; FAKE NEWS; POWER;
D O I
10.2196/45583
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health-related misinformation on social media is a key challenge to effective and timely public health responses. Existing mitigation measures include flagging misinformation or providing links to correct information, but they have not yet targeted social processes. Current approaches focus on increasing scrutiny, providing corrections to misinformation (debunking), or alerting users prospectively about future misinformation (prebunking and inoculation). Here, we provide a test of a complementary strategy that focuses on the social processes inherent in social media use, in particular, social reinforcement, social identity, and injunctive norms. Objective: This study aimed to examine whether providing balanced social reference cues (ie, cues that provide information on users sharing and, more importantly, not sharing specific content) in addition to flagging COVID-19-related misinformation leads to reductions in sharing behavior and improvement in overall sharing quality. Methods: A total of 3 field experiments were conducted on Twitter's native social media feed (via a newly developed browser extension). Participants'feed was augmented to include misleading and control information, resulting in 4 groups: no-information control, Twitter's own misinformation warning (misinformation flag), social cue only, and combined misinformation flag and social cue. We tracked the content shared or liked by participants. Participants were provided with social information by referencing either their personal network on Twitter or all Twitter users. Results: A total of 1424 Twitter users participated in 3 studies (n=824, n=322, and n=278). Across all 3 studies, we found that social cues that reference users' personal network combined with a misinformation flag reduced the sharing of misleading but not control information and improved overall sharing quality. We show that this improvement could be driven by a change in injunctive social norms (study 2) but not social identity (study 3). Conclusions: Social reference cues combined with misinformation flags can significantly and meaningfully reduce the amount of COVID-19-related misinformation shared and improve overall sharing quality. They are a feasible and scalable way to effectively curb the sharing of COVID-19-related misinformation on social media.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding the intent behind sharing misinformation on social media
    Agarwal, Basant
    Agarwal, Ajay
    Harjule, Priyanka
    Rahman, Azizur
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 35 (04) : 573 - 587
  • [2] Intervention Strategies for Misinformation Sharing on Social Media: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Zainudin, Juanita
    Mohamad Ali, Nazlena
    Smeaton, Alan F.
    Taha Ijab, Mohamad
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 140359 - 140379
  • [3] The impact of emotional vs rational message framing on social media users' detection and sharing of misinformation: an experimental study
    Miri, Arman
    Karimi-Shahanjarin, Akram
    Afshari, Maryam
    Tapak, Leili
    Bashirian, Saeed
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & ETHICS IN SOCIETY, 2024, 22 (03) : 321 - 330
  • [4] Cancer misinformation on social media
    Loeb, Stacy
    Langford, Aisha T.
    Bragg, Marie A.
    Sherman, Robert
    Chan, June M.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2024, 74 (05) : 453 - 464
  • [5] Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19
    Himelein-Wachowiak, Mckenzie
    Giorgi, Salvatore
    Devoto, Amanda
    Rahman, Muhammad
    Ungar, Lyle
    Schwartz, H. Andrew
    Epstein, David H.
    Leggio, Lorenzo
    Curtis, Brenda
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (05)
  • [6] Who shares misinformation on social media? A meta-analysis of individual traits related to misinformation sharing
    Sun, Yanqing
    Xie, Juan
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2024, 158
  • [7] Antecedents and Consequences of Misinformation Sharing Behavior among Adults on Social Media during COVID-19
    Malik, Ammara
    Bashir, Faiza
    Mahmood, Khalid
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [8] Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media
    Allcott, Hunt
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    Yu, Chuan
    RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2019, 6 (02)
  • [9] Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective
    Islam, A. K. M. Najmul
    Laato, Samuli
    Talukder, Shamim
    Sutinen, Erkki
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 159
  • [10] Going Viral: Sharing of Misinformation by Social Media Influencers
    Mulcahy, Rory
    Barnes, Renee
    Scheepers, Retha de Villiers
    Kay, Samantha
    List, Eleanor
    AUSTRALASIAN MARKETING JOURNAL, 2024,