Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases

被引:3
|
作者
Saito, Saki [1 ]
Yamada, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Yano, Rika [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuko [2 ]
Ebara, Akiko [2 ]
Sakanaka, Hiroe [2 ]
Matsumoto, Miho [3 ]
Ishimaru, Tomoko [3 ]
Utsuno, Hiroki [3 ]
Matsuzawa, Yuichi [1 ]
Ooka, Reina [1 ]
Fukuoka, Mio [1 ]
Akashi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kamijo, Shintaro [1 ]
Hamatani, Toshio [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Univ Hosp, Clin Lab, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Cancer; Autoimmune disease; Fertility preservation; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Female infertility; Cryopreservation; Oocyte quality; Embryo quality; Remission; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MATURATION; HORMONE; SOCIETY; IVF;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe indications for fertility preservation (FP) have expanded. A few patients who underwent gonadotoxic treatment did not have the opportunity to receive FP, leading to concerns that these patients may develop premature ovarian insufficiency. However, the usefulness of FP in women with reduced ovarian reserve has also been questioned. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation can improve the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, but there is limited data on the efficacy of FP with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 43 women with cancer or autoimmune diseases before and after gonadotoxic treatment at the reproductive unit of Keio University Hospital, counselled between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. After counselling, informed consent was obtained for FP from 43 patients, with those who underwent gonadotoxic treatment of the primary disease being prioritised. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue or progestin was used to suppress luteinising hormone in COS before or after gonadotoxic treatment. The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes was the primary outcome.ResultsForty-three patients and 67 assisted reproductive technology cycles were included in the analysis. The median age at entry was 32 [inter quartile range (IQR), 29-37] years. All patients in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group had their oocytes frozen. Gonadotoxic treatment resulted in fewer oocytes [median 3 (IQR 1-4); pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: five patients, 13 cycles] vs. median 9 (IQR 5-14; pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: 38 patients, 54 cycles; P < 0.001). Although anti-Mullerian hormone levels were lower in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 5, 13 cycles, median 0.29 (IQR 0.15-1.04) pg/mL) than in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 38, 54 cycles, median 1.89 (IQR 1.15-4.08) pg/mL) (P = 0.004), oocyte maturation rates were higher in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group [median 100 (IQR 77.5-100) %] than in the pre-gonadotoxic group [median 90.3 (IQR 75.0-100) %; P = 0.039]. Five patients in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group had their cryopreserved embryos thawed, of which three had live births.ConclusionsOocytes obtained for FP from women with cancer or autoimmune disease for FP are of satisfactory quality, regardless of whether they are obtained post-gonadotoxic treatment or COS protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fertility preservation for patients with cancer
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Kim, Tak
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 65 (06): : 329 - 337
  • [42] Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer
    Roesch, Erin E.
    Moore, Halle C. F.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2021, 13 (03) : 197 - 207
  • [43] Fertility preservation in cancer patients
    Wunder, Dorothea
    Perey, Lucien
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142
  • [44] Thirteen years’ experience in fertility preservation for cancer patients after in vitro fertilization and in vitro maturation treatments
    Helene Creux
    Patricia Monnier
    Weon-Young Son
    William Buckett
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 583 - 592
  • [45] Safety of fertility treatments in women with systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs)
    Vanni, V. S.
    De Lorenzo, R.
    Privitera, L.
    Canti, V
    Vigano, P.
    Rovere-Querini, P.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 18 (09) : 841 - 852
  • [46] Fertility preservation in oncological diseases: state of the art
    Findeklee, Sebastian
    van der Ven, Hans
    GYNAKOLOGIE, 2022, 55 (12): : 926 - 933
  • [47] Reproductive outcomes after oocyte banking for fertility preservation
    Balkenende, Eva M. E.
    Dahhan, Taghride
    van der Veen, Fulco
    Repping, Sjoerd
    Goddijn, Mariette
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 37 (04) : 425 - 433
  • [48] A Real-Life Analysis of Reproductive Outcome after Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients
    Hulsbosch, Sofie
    Koskas, Martin
    Tomassetti, Carla
    De Sutter, Petra
    Wildiers, Hans
    Neven, Patrick
    D'Hooghe, Thomas
    Amant, Frederic
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2018, 83 (02) : 156 - 163
  • [49] Factors affecting decision making about fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study
    Peddie, V. L.
    Porter, M. A.
    Barbour, R.
    Culligan, D.
    MacDonald, G.
    King, D.
    Horn, J.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (09) : 1049 - 1057
  • [50] Effect of breast cancer prognostic factors on ovarian reserve and response in fertility preservation
    Grynberg, Michael
    Zeghari, Faycal
    Peigne, Maeliss
    Benoit, Alexandra
    Rakrouki, Sophia
    Sifer, Christophe
    Mayeur, Anne
    Sais, Emine
    Sonigo, Charlotte
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (05)