Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases

被引:3
|
作者
Saito, Saki [1 ]
Yamada, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Yano, Rika [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuko [2 ]
Ebara, Akiko [2 ]
Sakanaka, Hiroe [2 ]
Matsumoto, Miho [3 ]
Ishimaru, Tomoko [3 ]
Utsuno, Hiroki [3 ]
Matsuzawa, Yuichi [1 ]
Ooka, Reina [1 ]
Fukuoka, Mio [1 ]
Akashi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kamijo, Shintaro [1 ]
Hamatani, Toshio [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Univ Hosp, Clin Lab, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Cancer; Autoimmune disease; Fertility preservation; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Female infertility; Cryopreservation; Oocyte quality; Embryo quality; Remission; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MATURATION; HORMONE; SOCIETY; IVF;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe indications for fertility preservation (FP) have expanded. A few patients who underwent gonadotoxic treatment did not have the opportunity to receive FP, leading to concerns that these patients may develop premature ovarian insufficiency. However, the usefulness of FP in women with reduced ovarian reserve has also been questioned. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation can improve the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, but there is limited data on the efficacy of FP with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 43 women with cancer or autoimmune diseases before and after gonadotoxic treatment at the reproductive unit of Keio University Hospital, counselled between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. After counselling, informed consent was obtained for FP from 43 patients, with those who underwent gonadotoxic treatment of the primary disease being prioritised. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue or progestin was used to suppress luteinising hormone in COS before or after gonadotoxic treatment. The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes was the primary outcome.ResultsForty-three patients and 67 assisted reproductive technology cycles were included in the analysis. The median age at entry was 32 [inter quartile range (IQR), 29-37] years. All patients in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group had their oocytes frozen. Gonadotoxic treatment resulted in fewer oocytes [median 3 (IQR 1-4); pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: five patients, 13 cycles] vs. median 9 (IQR 5-14; pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: 38 patients, 54 cycles; P < 0.001). Although anti-Mullerian hormone levels were lower in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 5, 13 cycles, median 0.29 (IQR 0.15-1.04) pg/mL) than in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 38, 54 cycles, median 1.89 (IQR 1.15-4.08) pg/mL) (P = 0.004), oocyte maturation rates were higher in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group [median 100 (IQR 77.5-100) %] than in the pre-gonadotoxic group [median 90.3 (IQR 75.0-100) %; P = 0.039]. Five patients in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group had their cryopreserved embryos thawed, of which three had live births.ConclusionsOocytes obtained for FP from women with cancer or autoimmune disease for FP are of satisfactory quality, regardless of whether they are obtained post-gonadotoxic treatment or COS protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preservation of ovarian function and fertility despite gonadotoxic chemotherapy
    Blumenfeld, Zeev
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 7 (05) : 567 - 576
  • [32] Assessing Knowledge, Counseling, and Referral Patterns Regarding Fertility Preservation Before Gonadotoxic Treatments Among Physicians in the Military Health System
    Boedeker, David
    Hunkler, Kiley
    Pekny, Carissa
    Watson, Nora
    Yamasaki, Meghan
    Drayer, Sara
    Spitzer, Trimble
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13 (04) : 607 - 613
  • [33] A practical survey of fertility-preservation treatments in the startup phase in Japan
    Takae, Seido
    Kato, Keiichi
    Watanabe, Chie
    Nara, Kazuko
    Koizumi, Tomoe
    Kawai, Kiyotaka
    Ota, Kuniaki
    Yumura, Yasushi
    Yabuuchi, Akiko
    Kuwahara, Akira
    Furui, Tatsuro
    Takai, Yasushi
    Irahara, Minoru
    Suzuki, Nao
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 48 (05) : 1061 - 1075
  • [34] Fertility outcomes several years after urgent fertility preservation for patients with breast cancer
    Peigne, Mealiss
    Mur, Pauline
    Laup, Laetitia
    Hamy, Anne-Sophie
    Sifer, Christophe
    Mayeur, Anne
    Eustache, Florence
    Sarandi, Solmaz
    Vinolas, Claire
    Rakrouki, Sophia
    Benoit, Alexandra
    Grynberg, Michael
    Sonigo, Charlotte
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (03) : 504 - 513
  • [35] Oocyte vitrification versus ovarian cortex transplantation in fertility preservation for adult women undergoing gonadotoxic treatments: a prospective cohort study
    Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
    Domingo, Javier
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan Antonio
    Herraiz, Sonia
    Mirabet, Vicente
    Iniesta, Ignacio
    Cobo, Ana
    Remohi, Jose
    Pellicer, Antonio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (03) : 478 - +
  • [36] Which patients pursue fertility preservation treatments? A multicenter analysis of the predictors of fertility preservation in women with breast cancer
    Kim, Jayeon
    Oktay, Kutluk
    Gracia, Clarisa
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Morse, Christopher
    Mersereau, Jennifer E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 97 (03) : 671 - 676
  • [37] Hereditary breast cancer and fertility preservation outcomes
    Arab, Suha
    Tulandi, Togas
    Buckett, William
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (05) : 1163 - 1168
  • [38] Fertility Counseling and Preservation for Breast Cancer Patients
    Dinas, Konstantinos D.
    DISEASES OF THE BREAST DURING PREGNANCY AND LACTATION, 2020, 1252 : 181 - 187
  • [39] Female fertility preservation in autoimmune diseases: possibilities and practises in France
    Carre-Pigeon, F.
    Schubert, B.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (09): : 853 - 860
  • [40] Response to Ovarian Stimulation for Urgent Fertility Preservation before Gonadotoxic Treatment in BRCA-Pathogenic-Variant-Positive Breast Cancer Patients
    El Moujahed, Lina
    Philis, Robin
    Grynberg, Michael
    Laot, Lucie
    Mur, Pauline
    Amsellem, Noemi
    Mayeur, Anne
    Benoit, Alexandra
    Rakrouki, Sophia
    Sifer, Christophe
    Peigne, Maeliss
    Sonigo, Charlotte
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)