Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases

被引:3
|
作者
Saito, Saki [1 ]
Yamada, Mitsutoshi [1 ]
Yano, Rika [2 ]
Takahashi, Kazuko [2 ]
Ebara, Akiko [2 ]
Sakanaka, Hiroe [2 ]
Matsumoto, Miho [3 ]
Ishimaru, Tomoko [3 ]
Utsuno, Hiroki [3 ]
Matsuzawa, Yuichi [1 ]
Ooka, Reina [1 ]
Fukuoka, Mio [1 ]
Akashi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Kamijo, Shintaro [1 ]
Hamatani, Toshio [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Keio Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Keio Univ Hosp, Clin Lab, 35 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
关键词
Cancer; Autoimmune disease; Fertility preservation; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Female infertility; Cryopreservation; Oocyte quality; Embryo quality; Remission; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; MATURATION; HORMONE; SOCIETY; IVF;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe indications for fertility preservation (FP) have expanded. A few patients who underwent gonadotoxic treatment did not have the opportunity to receive FP, leading to concerns that these patients may develop premature ovarian insufficiency. However, the usefulness of FP in women with reduced ovarian reserve has also been questioned. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation can improve the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, but there is limited data on the efficacy of FP with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 43 women with cancer or autoimmune diseases before and after gonadotoxic treatment at the reproductive unit of Keio University Hospital, counselled between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021. After counselling, informed consent was obtained for FP from 43 patients, with those who underwent gonadotoxic treatment of the primary disease being prioritised. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue or progestin was used to suppress luteinising hormone in COS before or after gonadotoxic treatment. The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes was the primary outcome.ResultsForty-three patients and 67 assisted reproductive technology cycles were included in the analysis. The median age at entry was 32 [inter quartile range (IQR), 29-37] years. All patients in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group had their oocytes frozen. Gonadotoxic treatment resulted in fewer oocytes [median 3 (IQR 1-4); pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: five patients, 13 cycles] vs. median 9 (IQR 5-14; pre-gonadotoxic treatment group: 38 patients, 54 cycles; P < 0.001). Although anti-Mullerian hormone levels were lower in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 5, 13 cycles, median 0.29 (IQR 0.15-1.04) pg/mL) than in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group (n = 38, 54 cycles, median 1.89 (IQR 1.15-4.08) pg/mL) (P = 0.004), oocyte maturation rates were higher in the post-gonadotoxic treatment group [median 100 (IQR 77.5-100) %] than in the pre-gonadotoxic group [median 90.3 (IQR 75.0-100) %; P = 0.039]. Five patients in the pre-gonadotoxic treatment group had their cryopreserved embryos thawed, of which three had live births.ConclusionsOocytes obtained for FP from women with cancer or autoimmune disease for FP are of satisfactory quality, regardless of whether they are obtained post-gonadotoxic treatment or COS protocols.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Usage of Cryopreserved Reproductive Material in Cancer Patients Undergoing Fertility Preservation Procedures
    Wnuk, Katarzyna
    Switalski, Jakub
    Miazga, Wojciech
    Tatara, Tomasz
    Religioni, Urszula
    Olszewski, Pawel
    Augustynowicz, Anna
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [22] Male fertility preservation before gonadotoxic therapies
    Wyns, Christine
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2010, 2 (02): : 88 - 108
  • [23] Topic Update: Effects of Colorectal Cancer Treatments on Female Fertility and Potential Methods for Fertility Preservation
    O'Neill, Mary Teresa
    Dhonnchu, Tara Ni
    Brannigan, Ann E.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (03) : 363 - 369
  • [24] Fertility Preservation in Women After the Cancer
    Lappi, Michela
    Borini, Andrea
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2012, 18 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [25] Fifteen year follow-up of embryos cryopreserved in cancer patients for fertility preservation
    Barcroft, J.
    Dayoub, N.
    Thong, K. J.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2013, 30 (11) : 1407 - 1413
  • [26] Fertility Preservation Methods in Breast Cancer
    Peccatori, Fedro A.
    Del Pup, Lino
    Salvagno, Francesca
    Guido, Maurizio
    Sarno, Maria A.
    Revelli, Alberto
    Delle Piane, Luisa
    Dolfin, Elisabetta
    Franchi, Dorella
    Molinari, Emanuela
    Immediata, Valentina
    Chiavari, Leonora
    Vucetich, Alessandra
    Borini, Andrea
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [27] Challenges of fertility preservation in non-oncological diseases
    Condorelli, Margherita
    Demeestere, Isabelle
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (05) : 638 - 646
  • [28] Disparities in access to fertility preservation among adolescents undergoing gonadotoxic therapies
    Murphy, Hana G.
    Isaacson, Erin
    Moravek, Molly B.
    Ellman, Erin
    Compton, Sarah D.
    Rosen, Monica W.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2024, 41 (12) : 3559 - 3565
  • [29] Impact of breast cancer treatments on fertility and the importance of timing for a fertility preservation intervention
    Castillo, Cecilia
    Camejo, Natalia
    REVISTA DE SENOLOGIA Y PATOLOGIA MAMARIA, 2022, 35 (04): : 305 - 311
  • [30] Fertility preservation with ovarian stimulation protocols prior to cancer treatment
    Kasum, Miro
    Simunic, Velimir
    Oreskovic, Slavko
    Beketic-Oreskovic, Lidija
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (03) : 182 - 186