Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimating equations in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Debates persist regarding the performance of existing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations in older individuals. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the accuracy and bias of six commonly used equations, including the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation (CKDEPICr) and its combination with cystatin C (CKD-EPICr-Cys), with the corresponding pair of the Berlin Initiative Study equations (BIS1 and BIS2) and the Full Age Spectrum equations (FASCr and FASCr-Cys). Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing estimated GFR (eGFR) with measured GFR (mGFR). We analyzed the difference in P30 and bias among the six equations and investigated subgroups based on the area (Asian and non-Asian), mean age (60-74 years and & GE;75 years), and levels of mean mGFR (<45 mL/min/1.73m2 and & GE;45 mL/min/1.73m2). Results: 27 studies with 18,112 participants were included, all reporting P30 and bias. BIS1 and FASCr exhibited significantly higher P30 than CKD-EPICr. While no significant differences were observed between FASCr and BIS1, or among the three combined equations in terms of either P30 or bias. Subgroup analyses revealed FASCr and FASCr-Cys achieved better results in most situations. However, in the subgroup of mGFR<45 mL/min/1.73m2, CKD-EPICr-Cys had relatively higher P30 and significantly smaller bias. Conclusions: Overall, BIS and FAS provided relatively more accurate estimates of GFR than CKD-EPI in older adults. FASCr and FASCr-Cys may be better suited for various conditions, while CKD-EPICr-Cys would be a better option for older individuals with impaired renal function.