Does environmental pollution liability insurance promote environmental performance? Firm-level evidence from quasi-natural experiment in China

被引:29
作者
Zhu, Dandan [1 ]
Chen, Ke [1 ]
Sun, Chuanwang [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Lyu, Chaofeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, China Ctr Energy Econ Res, Sch Econ, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, MOE Key Lab Econometr, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance & Taxat, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[5] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
Emission reduction; Environmental pollution liability insurance; Difference-in-differences; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; PROPENSITY SCORE; INNOVATION; REGULATIONS; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106493
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Taking China's environmental pollution liability insurance (EPLI) in 2008 as a quasi-natural experiment and using extensive panel data from the Chinese Industrial Enterprise Pollution Database (1998-2014) and Chinese Industrial Enterprise Database (1998-2013), this paper identifies the implementation effects of EPLI on emission reduction by employing the method of time-varying difference-in-differences. Results demonstrate that marketbased environmental regulation has significantly promoted all types of industrial firms' emission reduction, except collective enterprises. EPLI, as a market-based environmental regulation, owns more flexible mechanisms to stimulate firms to reduce emissions, including reducing the usage of coal and oil and increasing the quantity of emission treatment facilities and investment. This paper provides empirical evidence to support the usage of EPLI in improving environmental performance, which not only comprehensively evaluates China's market-based tool but also provides treasures experience for the environmental management of developing countries on a firm level.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China
    Zhang, Hua
    Xu, Tiantian
    Feng, Chao
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 108
  • [2] Environmental insurance and green productivity: A firm-level evidence from China
    Wen, Hong-xing
    Cui, Ting
    Wu, Xiao-qing
    Nie, Pu-yan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
  • [3] Ownership and environmental pollution: Firm-level evidence in China
    Huang, Chia-Hui
    Chang, Hsiao-Fen
    ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 24 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [4] Environmental regulation and firms' performance: a quasi-natural experiment from China
    Li, Juan
    Zhao, Min
    Yang, Yien
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (03) : 278 - 294
  • [5] Environmental Pollution Liability Insurance of Health Risk and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence From China
    Wu, Wenqing
    Zhang, Pianpian
    Zhu, Dongyang
    Jiang, Xin
    Jakovljevic, Mihajlo
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [6] Does foreign ownership promote environmental protection? Evidence from firm-level data
    Balaguer, Jacint
    Cuadros, Ana
    Garcia-Quevedo, Jose
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2023, 60 (01) : 227 - 244
  • [7] The effect of environmental regulation on air pollution, productivity, and factor structure: a quasi-natural experiment evidence from China
    Zhang, Ning
    Zhao, Keke
    Yu, Yantuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (16) : 20392 - 20409
  • [8] Political governance and firm performance in China: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Cheng, Lei
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2025, 76
  • [9] Has building innovative provinces reduce environmental pollution?--evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Tang, Lu
    Tang, Mengcong
    Xi, Wenjia
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [10] Carbon risk and firm performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Justin Hung Nguyen
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 43 (01) : 65 - 90