Comparison of magnetic energy and helicity in coronal jet simulations

被引:7
|
作者
Pariat, E. [1 ]
Wyper, P. F. [2 ]
Linan, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Sorbonne Univ, Ecole Polytech, Inst Polytech Paris,Observ Paris PSL,CNRS,Lab Phys, 4 Pl Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Univ Durham, Dept Math Sci, Stockton Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Math Plasma Astrophys, Dept Math, Celestijnenlaan 200 B, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Sun; magnetic fields; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); magnetic reconnection; methods; numerical; activity; SOLAR ACTIVE REGIONS; QUASI-SEPARATRIX LAYERS; FLUX-DENSITY; FILAMENT ERUPTIONS; BREAKOUT MODEL; FLARE RIBBONS; CONNECTIVITY; RECONNECTION; INJECTION; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202245142
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. While non-potential (free) magnetic energy is a necessary element of any active phenomenon in the solar corona, its role as a marker of the trigger of the eruptive process remains elusive. Meanwhile, recent analyses of numerical simulations of solar active events have shown that quantities based on relative magnetic helicity could highlight the eruptive nature of solar magnetic systems.Aims. Based on the unique decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and non-potential components, magnetic energy and helicity can also both be uniquely decomposed into two quantities. Using two 3D magnetohydrodynamics parametric simulations of a configuration that can produce coronal jets, we compare the dynamics of the magnetic energies and of the relative magnetic helicities.Methods. Both simulations share the same initial setup and line-tied bottom-boundary driving profile. However, they differ by the duration of the forcing. In one simulation, the system is driven sufficiently so that a point of no return is passed and the system induces the generation of a helical jet. The generation of the jet is, however, markedly delayed after the end of the driving phase; a relatively long phase of lower-intensity reconnection takes place before the jet is eventually induced. In the other reference simulation, the system is driven during a shorter time, and no jet is produced.Results. As expected, we observe that the jet-producing simulation contains a higher value of non-potential energy and non-potential helicity compared to the non-eruptive system. Focussing on the phase between the end of the driving-phase and the jet generation, we note that magnetic energies remain relatively constant, while magnetic helicities have a noticeable evolution. During this post-driving phase, the ratio of the non-potential to total magnetic energy very slightly decreases while the helicity eruptivity index, which is the ratio of the non-potential helicity to the total relative magnetic helicity, significantly increases. The jet is generated when the system is at the highest value of this helicity eruptivity index. This proxy critically decreases during the jet-generation phase. The free energy also decreases but does not present any peak when the jet is being generated.Conclusions. Our study further strengthens the importance of helicities, and in particular of the helicity eruptivity index, to understand the trigger mechanism of solar eruptive events.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Jet phenomena above null points of the coronal magnetic field
    Filippov, B.
    Koutchmy, S.
    Golub, L.
    GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2009, 49 (08) : 1109 - 1112
  • [42] Comparison of Two Coronal Magnetic Field Models to Reconstruct a Sigmoidal Solar Active Region with Coronal Loops
    Duan, Aiying
    Jiang, Chaowei
    Hu, Qiang
    Zhang, Huai
    Gary, G. Allen
    Wu, S. T.
    Cao, Jinbin
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 842 (02)
  • [43] Lagrangian coherent structures in photospheric flows and their implications for coronal magnetic structure
    Yeates, A. R.
    Hornig, G.
    Welsch, B. T.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2012, 539
  • [44] SIMULATIONS OF EMERGING MAGNETIC FLUX. II. THE FORMATION OF UNSTABLE CORONAL FLUX ROPES AND THE INITIATION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
    Leake, James E.
    Linton, Mark G.
    Antiochos, Spiro K.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 787 (01)
  • [45] Magnetic field and kinetic helicity evolution in simulations of interacting disk galaxies
    Selg, S.
    Schmidt, W.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2024, 689
  • [46] Magnetic helicity and higher helicity invariants as constraints for dynamo action
    Sokoloff, Dmitry
    Akhmetyev, Peter
    Illarionov, Egor
    FLUID DYNAMICS RESEARCH, 2018, 50 (01)
  • [47] Onset of a Large Ejective Solar Eruption from a Typical Coronal-jet-base Field Configuration
    Joshi, Navin Chandra
    Sterling, Alphonse C.
    Moore, Ronald L.
    Magara, Tetsuya
    Moon, Young-Jae
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 845 (01)
  • [48] Evidence of Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Flux and Associated Flare
    Chandra, R.
    Schmieder, B.
    Aulanier, G.
    Malherbe, J. M.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2009, 258 (01) : 53 - 67
  • [49] MAGNETIC HELICITY AND ENERGY SPECTRA OF A SOLAR ACTIVE REGION
    Zhang, Hongqi
    Brandenburg, Axel
    Sokoloff, D. D.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2014, 784 (02)
  • [50] Comparison of methods for modelling coronal magnetic fields
    Goldstraw, E. E.
    Hood, A. W.
    Browning, P. K.
    Cargill, P. J.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2018, 610