Philosophy as a Science and as a Humanity?

被引:0
作者
Strevens, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Philosophy, New York, NY 10003 USA
关键词
Philosophical methodology; Analytic epistemology; Method of cases; Conceptual analysis; Philip Kitcher;
D O I
10.1007/s11406-024-00720-w
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This commentary on Philip Kitcher's book What's the Use of Philosophy? addresses two questions. First, must philosophers be methodologically self-conscious to do good work? Second, is there value in the questions pursued in the traditional areas of analytic philosophy?
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Bishop M., 2005, EPISTEMOLOGY PSYCHOL
[2]  
Burgess A, 2013, PHILOS COMPASS, V8, P1091, DOI 10.1111/phc3.12086
[3]   Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? [J].
Haslanger, S .
NOUS, 2000, 34 (01) :31-55
[4]  
Kuhn T., 2012, The structure of scientific revolutions, V4th ed., DOI [10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001, DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226458144.001.0001]
[5]  
Machery E., 2017, Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198807520.001.0001
[6]  
Nguyen C. T., 2020, Games: Agency as Art
[7]  
Stoljar Daniel., 2017, Philosophical Progress
[8]  
STREVENS M., 2020, The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Sci- ence
[9]  
Strevens Michael., 2019, THINKING YOUR FEET E
[10]  
Williamson T., 2007, The philosophy of philosophy, DOI [10.1002/9780470696675, DOI 10.1002/9780470696675]