Optimal sensor placement for corrosion induced thickness loss monitoring in ship structures

被引:3
作者
Silionis, Nicholas E. [1 ]
Anyfantis, Konstantinos N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Ship Hull Struct Hlth Monitoring S H SHM Grp, 9 Heroon Polytech Av, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Predictive maintenance; Probabilistic loads; Optimal sensor placement; Corrosion; Structural health monitoring; DISPLACEMENT; RELIABILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103524
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Current monitoring strategies revolve around proactive maintenance. Corrosion-induced thickness loss (CITL) is one of the most common types of structural deterioration in ship hulls. Recently, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has emerged as an appealing alternative that may drive the transition to predictive maintenance. The complexity of ship structures requires that any SHM system must be designed to fully exploit information collected from a limited number of sensors. The aim of this work is to take a step in this direction by framing the design of an SHM system for CITL monitoring in hull structures under the guise of an optimization problem. The problem of detecting the existence of a certain level of thickness loss in hull structural elements is considered and treated using detection theory. The Optimal Sensor Placement (OSP) problem aims to generate strain sensor architectures that maximize the performance of the employed detector and minimize the costs incurred by its erroneous decisions. A computational implementation is considered, and synthetic strain data are generated using a detailed FE model of a reference vessel. Uncertainty is propagated to the data through a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). A Genetic Algorithm (GA) is employed to treat the optimization problem and the resultant sensor designs are compared to manually selected alternatives.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Alemohammad H., 2018, Optics InfoBase Conference Papers, DOI [DOI 10.1364/OFS.2018.TUB4, 10.1364/OFS.2018.TuB4]
  • [2] American Bureau of Shipping, 2022, Guide for smart functions for marine vessels and offshore units
  • [3] American Bureau of Shipping, 2020, Advisory on structural Health monitoring: the application of sensor-based approaches
  • [4] An abstract approach toward the structural digital twin of ship hulls: A numerical study applied to a box girder geometry
    Anyfantis, Konstantinos N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 235 (03) : 718 - 736
  • [5] Bayesian optimal sensor placement for crack identification in structures using strain measurements
    Argyris, Costas
    Chowdhury, Sharmistha
    Zabel, Volkmar
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2018, 25 (05)
  • [6] A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications
    Avci, Onur
    Abdeljaber, Osama
    Kiranyaz, Serkan
    Hussein, Mohammed
    Gabbouj, Moncef
    Inman, Daniel J.
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 147
  • [7] A framework for validation of computer models
    Bayarri, Maria J.
    Berger, James O.
    Paulo, Rui
    Sacks, Jerry
    Cafeo, John A.
    Cavendish, James
    Lin, Chin-Hsu
    Tu, Jian
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 2007, 49 (02) : 138 - 154
  • [8] Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy
    Brynjarsdottir, Jenny
    O'Hagan, Anthony
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
  • [9] On statistical Multi-Objective optimization of sensor networks and optimal detector derivation for structural health monitoring
    Colombo, Luca
    Todd, M. D.
    Sbarufatti, C.
    Giglio, M.
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 167
  • [10] Farrar C.R., 2013, STRUCTURAL HLTH MONI, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118443118