Network connectedness and the contagion structure of informed trading: Evidence from the time and frequency domains

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Wandi [1 ]
Gao, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Informed trading; Industry board; Spillover effect; Network community detection; IMPULSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; PRICE; LIQUIDITY; VOLATILITY; DYNAMICS; IMPACT; TRADES; RISK; LAWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102907
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, the network connectedness of informed trading between industries and its contagion structure are studied in the time and frequency domains based on Chinese stock markets. Using the spillover index method, we find significant interindustry spillover effects of informed trading. Specifically, Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Materials are the primary spillover sources that have strong outward spillover effects on all other industries, while Communication Services and Financial represent the top recipients in the market. In addition, using the network community detection algorithm, a 2-community structure of contagion is further revealed. The two communities are driven by Industrials and Consumer Discretionary, respectively. More important, the strong outward effects of Industrials, Consumer Discretionary, and Materials and their interlinkages would cause both intracommunity and intercommunity spillovers and result in market-wide informed trading contagion. Furthermore, the frequency decomposition analysis illustrates that interindustry spillovers of informed trading are usually dominated by low-frequency (6-200 days) connectedness. Finally, the contributing factor analysis demonstrates that macroeconomic changes are the main determinants of informed trading spillovers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains [J].
Aboody, D ;
Lev, B .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (06) :2747-2766
[2]   A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability [J].
Admati, Anat R. ;
Pfleiderer, Paul .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1988, 1 (01) :3-40
[3]   Does PIN measure information? Informed trading effects on returns and liquidity in six emerging markets [J].
Agudelo, Diego A. ;
Giraido, Santiago ;
Villarraga, Edwin .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2015, 39 :149-161
[4]   Heterogeneous dependence and dynamic hedging between sectors of BRIC and global markets [J].
Ahmad, Wasim ;
Mishra, Anil V. ;
Daly, Kevin .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 59 :117-133
[5]   Sectoral dynamics of financial contagion in Europe - The cases of the recent crises episodes [J].
Alexakis, Christos ;
Pappas, Vasileios .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2018, 73 :222-239
[6]   An analysis of trade-size clustering and its relation to stealth trading [J].
Alexander, Gordon J. ;
Peterson, Mark A. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 84 (02) :435-471
[7]   Does Asymmetric Information Drive Herding? An Empirical Analysis [J].
Alhaj-Yaseen, Yaseen S. ;
Rao, Xi .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2019, 20 (04) :451-470
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Economic Systems, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECOSYS.2004.06.003
[9]   The characteristics of informed trading: Implications for asset pricing [J].
Aslan, Hadiye ;
Easley, David ;
Hvidkjaer, Soeren ;
O'Hara, Maureen .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2011, 18 (05) :782-801
[10]   The impact of trades on daily volatility [J].
Avramov, Doron ;
Chordia, Tarun ;
Goyal, Amit .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (04) :1241-1277