Oblique Projection-Based Modal Matching Algorithm for LPV Model Order Reduction of Aeroservoelastic Systems

被引:4
作者
Liu, Yishu [1 ]
Gao, Wei [1 ]
Li, Qifu [1 ]
Lu, Bei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Aeronaut & Astronaut, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
aeroservoelasticity; linear parameter-varying system; model order reduction; modal matching; state consistency; oblique projection; FLUTTER SUPPRESSION;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace10050406
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
An aeroservoelastic system can be described as a gridding-based linear parameter-varying (LPV) model, whose dynamic characteristics usually vary with the airspeed. Due to the high order of the system, it is necessary to perform order reduction on LPV models to overcome the control design challenges. However, when directly extending linear time-invariant (LTI) model order reduction technologies to the LPV system, states of the reduced-order LTI models generated separately at different grid points could be inconsistent. In this paper, a novel modal matching algorithm is proposed to solve the problem of state inconsistency by identifying the internal connection between the models at adjacent grid points. An oblique projection-based distance metric is defined to improve the reliability of the modal matching algorithm. The reduced-order LPV model constructed based on this method would have a high fidelity relative to the original model and a smooth interpolation performance between grid points. The proposed algorithm is applied to the X-56A aircraft, and numerical results show its effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   AN ONLINE METHOD FOR INTERPOLATING LINEAR PARAMETRIC REDUCED-ORDER MODELS [J].
Amsallem, David ;
Farhat, Charbel .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2011, 33 (05) :2169-2198
[2]   A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems [J].
Benner, Peter ;
Gugercin, Serkan ;
Willcox, Karen .
SIAM REVIEW, 2015, 57 (04) :483-531
[3]   Design and flight test of active flutter suppression on the X-56A multi-utility technology test-bed aircraft [J].
Burnett, E. L. ;
Beranek, J. A. ;
Holm-Hansen, B. T. ;
Atkinson, C. J. ;
Flick, P. M. .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 120 (1228) :893-909
[4]  
Danowsky B.P., 2013, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics (AFM) Conference, DOI [10.2514/6.2013-4743, DOI 10.2514/6.2013-4743]
[5]   MODEL REDUCTIONS USING A PROJECTION FORMULATION [J].
DEVILLEMAGNE, C ;
SKELTON, RE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1987, 46 (06) :2141-2169
[6]   ON THE COMPUTATION OF THE GAP METRIC [J].
GEORGIOU, TT .
SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS, 1988, 11 (04) :253-257
[7]   Identification of Aeroelastic Models for the X-56A Longitudinal Dynamics Using Multisine Inputs and Output Error in the Frequency Domain [J].
Grauer, Jared A. ;
Boucher, Matthew J. .
AEROSPACE, 2019, 6 (02)
[8]  
Hjartarson A., 2013, AIAA ATM FLIGHT MECH
[9]  
Lax P.D., 1996, PURE APPL MATH, P112
[10]   Mass Balancing Optimization Study to Reduce Flutter Speeds of the X-56A Aircraft [J].
Li, Wesley W. ;
Pak, Chan-gi .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (04) :1359-U392