Evaluation of the Impact of Remote Monitoring Using the Sharesource Connectivity Platform on Adherence to Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in 51 Patients

被引:2
作者
Chang, Min-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Chi, Po-Jui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hsi-Hao [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Yi-Che [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Li-Chun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Ching-Fang [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Chen, Ching-Yang [1 ,2 ]
Liou, Hung-Hsiang [1 ,5 ]
Hung, Shih-Yuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, E Da Dachang Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] I Shou Univ, E Da Canc Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Hsin Jen Hosp, Dept Nephrol, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[6] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med Int Students, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2023年 / 29卷
关键词
Monitoring; Physiologic; Peritoneal Dialysis; Treatment Adherence and Compliance; CAPD;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.939523
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: This study from a single center in Taiwan aimed to evaluate the impact of remote patient monitoring (RPM) using the Sharesource connectivity platform on adherence to automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in 51 patients. Material/Methods: We analyzed data on 51 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) under APD. They were treated with a traditional APD machine HomeChoice (phase 1), changed to new APD machine HomeChoice Claria for 12 weeks (phase 2), then connected to the Sharesource platform for another 12 weeks (phase 3), and were followed up for 1 year. The non-adherence rate was compared between the 3 phases. The secondary outcomes included peritonitis rate, hospitalization rate, and hospitalization days, 1 year before and after receiving a new APD machine. Patients were subdivided into good and poor adherence (>1 episode of non-adherence in phase 1) groups for further analysis. Results: The average non-adherence rates were 10.5%, 5.1%, and 4.9% in phases 1, 2, and 3, respectively, although differences were not significant. Serum potassium (P<0.0001) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (P=0.026) levels significantly decreased in phase 3. The 1-year peritonitis rate, hospitalization rate, and number of days of hospitalization showed no significant changes. Subgroup analysis revealed that the non-adherence rate in the poor adherence group decreased from 48.4% in phase 1 to 14.2% and 12.4% in phases 2 and 3, respectively (P=0.007). Conclusions: Remoting monitoring using the Sharesource connectivity platform increased dialysis adherence in APD treatment, especially in patients with poor adherence. Serum potassium level and inflammation status were also improved by this system.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bernardini J, 1997, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V17, P338
[2]   Compliance in CAPD and CCPD patients as measured by supply inventories during home visits [J].
Bernardini, J ;
Piraino, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 31 (01) :101-107
[3]   Through the Storm: Automated Peritoneal Dialysis with Remote Patient Monitoring during COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Bunch, Alfonso ;
Ardila, Freddy ;
Castano, Ricardo ;
Quinonez, Sylvia ;
Corzo, Leyder .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2021, 50 (03) :279-282
[4]   Remote Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Management in Colombia [J].
Bunch, Alfonso ;
Vesga, Jasmin I. ;
Camargo, David O. ;
Corzo, Leyder ;
Molano, Alejandra P. ;
Devia, Martha E. ;
Rios, Maria C. ;
Rodriguez, Claudia P. ;
Sanchez, Ricardo ;
Rivera, Angela S. ;
Sanabria, Rafael M. .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2019, 4 (06) :873-876
[5]   Peritoneal Dialysis Use and Practice Patterns: An International Survey Study [J].
Cho, Yeoungjee ;
Bello, Aminu K. ;
Levin, Adeera ;
Lunney, Meaghan ;
Osman, Mohamed A. ;
Ye, Feng ;
Ashuntantang, Gloria E. ;
Bellorin-Font, Ezequiel ;
Gharbi, Mohammed Benghanem ;
Davison, Sara N. ;
Ghnaimat, Mohammad ;
Harden, Paul ;
Htay, Htay ;
Jha, Vivekanand ;
Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar ;
Kerr, Peter G. ;
Klarenbach, Scott ;
Kovesdy, Csaba P. ;
Luyckx, Valerie ;
Neuen, Brendon ;
O'Donoghue, Donal ;
Ossareh, Shahrzad ;
Perl, Jeffrey ;
Rashid, Harun Ur ;
Rondeau, Eric ;
See, Emily J. ;
Saad, Syed ;
Sola, Laura ;
Tchokhonelidze, Irma ;
Tesar, Vladimir ;
Tungsanga, Kriang ;
Kazancioglu, Rumeyza Turan ;
Wang, Angela Yee-Moon ;
Yang, Chih-Wei ;
Zemchenkov, Alexander ;
Zhao, Ming-Hui ;
Jager, Kitty J. ;
Caskey, Fergus J. ;
Jindal, Kailash K. ;
Okpechi, Ikechi G. ;
Tonelli, Marcello ;
Harris, David C. ;
Johnson, David W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2021, 77 (03) :315-325
[6]  
Denhaerynd K, 2007, AM J CRIT CARE, V16, P222
[7]   Non-Adherence in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Systematic Review [J].
Griva, Konstadina ;
Lai, Alden Yuanhong ;
Lim, Haikel Asyraf ;
Yu, Zhenli ;
Foo, Marjorie Wai Yin ;
Newman, Stanton P. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[8]   Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Hill, Nathan R. ;
Fatoba, Samuel T. ;
Oke, Jason L. ;
Hirst, Jennifer A. ;
O'Callaghan, Christopher A. ;
Lasserson, Daniel S. ;
Hobbs, F. D. Richard .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07)
[9]   Outcomes of Remote Patient Monitoring for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Jung, Hee-Yeon ;
Jeon, Yena ;
Kim, Yon Su ;
Kim, Dong Ki ;
Lee, Jung Pyo ;
Yang, Chul Woo ;
Ko, Eun Jeong ;
Ryu, Dong-Ryeol ;
Kang, Shin-Wook ;
Park, Jung Tak ;
Lim, Jeong-Hoon ;
Choi, Ji-Young ;
Cho, Jang-Hee ;
Kim, Chan-Duck ;
Kim, Yong-Lim ;
Park, Sun-Hee .
NEPHRON, 2021, 145 (06) :702-710
[10]   Remote Monitoring of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Improves Personalization of Dialytic Prescription and Patient's Independence [J].
Manani, Sabrina Milan ;
Crepaldi, Carlo ;
Giuliani, Anna ;
Virzi, Grazia Maria ;
Garzotto, Francesco ;
Riello, Caterina ;
de Cal, Massimo ;
Rosner, Mitchell H. ;
Ronco, Claudio .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2018, 46 (02) :111-117