Abdominal drainage is contraindicated after uncomplicated hepatectomy: Results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
作者
Hajibandeh, Shahin [1 ,3 ]
Hajibandeh, Shahab [2 ]
Raza, Syed Soulat [1 ]
Bartlett, David [1 ]
Dasari, Bobby V. M. [1 ]
Sutcliffe, Robert P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg & Liver Transplant U, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Hosp Wales, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg Unit, Birmingham B15 2GW, England
关键词
HEPATIC RESECTION; PROPHYLACTIC DRAINAGE; ELECTIVE HEPATECTOMY; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.023
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: No conclusive recommendations exist regarding use of abdominal drainage in hepatectomy. The practice of abdominal drainage remains commonplace despite unfavorable outcomes reported by randomized controlled trials. We aimed to compare the impact of abdominal drainage on outcomes of hepatectomy. Methods: A systematic search of electronic information sources and bibliographic reference lists was conducted. A combination of free text and controlled vocabulary search adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators, and limits in each of the above databases was applied. Overall perioperative and wound-related complications, bile leak, intra-abdominal collections (including those requiring an intervention), and the length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome parameters. Results: Seven randomized controlled trials reporting 1,064 patients undergoing hepatectomy with (n = 533) or without (n = 531) placement of abdominal drain were included. Patients in both groups were of comparable age (P = .23), sex (P = .49), proportion of major hepatectomy (P = .93), minor hepatectomy (P = .96), cirrhosis (P = .78), and malignant pathologies (P = .61). Drainage after hepatectomy was associated with significantly higher overall complications (RR: 1.37, P =.0003) and wound-related complications (risk ratio: 2.29, P = .01) compared to no drainage. Moreover, there was no significant difference in bile leak (risk ratio: 2.15, P = .19), intra-abdominal collections (risk ratio: 1.13, P = .70), intra-abdominal collections requiring interventions (risk ratio: 1.19, P = .71), or length of hospital stay (mean difference: 0.37, P =.67) between the 2 groups. The trial sequential analysis confirmed conclusiveness of the findings. Conclusion: Abdominal drainage after hepatectomy increases overall and wound-related complications, without any reduction in the risk of intra-abdominal collections needing an intervention. Routine drainage after an uncomplicated hepatectomy should be avoided, with the possible exception of the presence of a bilioenteric anastomosis. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 411
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Is routine abdominal drainage necessary for patients undergoing elective hepatectomy? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Anweier, Nuerzatijiang ;
Apaer, Shadike ;
Zeng, Qi ;
Wu, Jing ;
Gu, Shensen ;
Li, Tao ;
Zhao, Jinming ;
Tuxun, Tuerhongjiang .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (06) :E24689
[2]   Drain Placement After Uncomplicated Hepatic Resection Increases Severe Postoperative Complication Rate A Japanese Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial (ND-trial) [J].
Arita, Junichi ;
Sakamaki, Kentaro ;
Saiura, Akio ;
Konishi, Masaru ;
Sakamoto, Yoshihiro ;
Hashimoto, Masaji ;
Sano, Tsuyoshi ;
Uesaka, Katsuhiko ;
Kokudo, Norihiro ;
Yamanaka, Takeharu ;
Shimada, Kazuaki .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 273 (02) :224-231
[3]   DRAINAGE AFTER ELECTIVE HEPATIC RESECTION - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BELGHITI, J ;
KABBEJ, M ;
SAUVANET, A ;
VILGRAIN, V ;
PANIS, Y ;
FEKETE, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (06) :748-753
[4]   THE ROLE OF ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE AFTER MAJOR HEPATIC RESECTION [J].
BONA, S ;
GAVELLI, A ;
HUGUET, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 167 (06) :593-595
[5]   Early postoperative ERAS compliance predicts decreased length of stay and complications following liver resection [J].
Burchard, Paul R. ;
Dave, Yatee A. ;
Loria, Anthony P. ;
Parikh, Neilesh B. ;
Pineda-Solis, Karen ;
Ruffolo, Luis I. ;
Strawderman, Myla ;
Schoeniger, Luke O. ;
Galka, Eva ;
Tomiyama, Koji ;
Orloff, Mark S. ;
Carpizo, Darren R. ;
Linehan, David C. ;
Hernandez-Alejandro, Roberto .
HPB, 2022, 24 (09) :1425-1432
[6]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of prophylactic abdominal drainage in major liver resections [J].
Dezfouli, Sepehr Abbasi ;
Uenal, Umut Kaan ;
Ghamarnejad, Omid ;
Khajeh, Elias ;
Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq ;
Ramouz, Ali ;
Salehpour, Roozbeh ;
Golriz, Mohammad ;
Chang, De-Hua ;
Mieth, Markus ;
Hoffmann, Katrin ;
Probst, Pascal ;
Mehrabi, Arianeb .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[7]   2012 Liver resections in the 21st century: we are far from zero mortality [J].
Dokmak, Safi ;
Fteriche, Fadhel Samir ;
Borscheid, Rene ;
Cauchy, Francois ;
Farges, Olivier ;
Belghiti, Jacques .
HPB, 2013, 15 (11) :908-915
[8]   Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection [J].
Fong, Y ;
Brennan, MF ;
Brown, K ;
Heffernan, N ;
Blumgart, LH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 171 (01) :158-162
[9]  
Fuster J, 2004, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V51, P536
[10]   Re-appraisal of prophylactic drainage in uncomplicated liver resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gavriilidis, Paschalis ;
Hidalgo, Ernest ;
de'Angelis, Nicola ;
Lodge, Peter ;
Azoulay, Daniel .
HPB, 2017, 19 (01) :16-20