Assessing scour prediction models for monopiles in sand from the perspective of design robustness

被引:8
作者
Chen, Xinwei [1 ]
Yu, Yang [1 ]
Wang, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ocean Coll, Zhoushan 316021, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn & Construct Manage, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Scour prediction model; Offshore wind turbine; Monopile; Robust geotechnical design; COMBINED WAVES; WIND TURBINE; OFFSHORE; PILE;
D O I
10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103532
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Scour constitutes an inevitable occurrence around the monopile foundations of offshore wind turbines (OWTs). The internal forces and deformation of the monopile are profoundly influenced by the scour depth, which can be assessed using various scour prediction models. However, owing to the presence of uncertainties stemming from the intricate marine environment subjected to wave and current loads, these scour prediction models often fail to yield a unique design for a monopile designs. The prudent selection of an appropriate scour prediction model assumes paramount importance in OWT design and safety, particularly for designers who lack extensive experience in this domain. This study introduces a framework designed to evaluate and compare six existing scour prediction models, with a focus on robust design. This framework concurrently accounts for safety, design robustness, and cost. To illustrate its practical applicability, the framework is employed in a 5-MW OWT example. Consequently, this study recommends the most favorable scour prediction model and the optimal design for monopiles in OWTs, emphasizing design robustness and precision. Additionally, the investigation delves into the influence of soil parameter variability on the selection of the preferred model and its impact on the design robustness.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American Bureau of Shipping (Abs), 1997, American Bureau of shipping: Rules for Building and classing offshore installation
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GUIDELINES DESIGN WI, V2nd
[4]   Design of monopiles for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps [J].
Arany, Laszlo ;
Bhattacharya, S. ;
Macdonald, John ;
Hogan, S. J. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 92 :126-152
[5]  
Boulanger R.W., 2003, Pile foundations in liquefied and laterally spreading ground during earthquakes: centrifuge experiments analyses
[6]   Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses [J].
Boulanger, RW ;
Curras, CJ ;
Kutter, BL ;
Wilson, DW ;
Abghari, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (09) :750-759
[7]   Assessment of the dynamic behaviour of saturated soil subjected to cyclic loading from offshore monopile wind turbine foundations [J].
Damgaard, M. ;
Bayat, M. ;
Andersen, L. V. ;
Ibsen, L. B. .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2014, 61 :116-126
[8]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[9]   Understanding knee points in bicriteria problems and their implications as preferred solution principles [J].
Deb, Kalyanmoy ;
Gupta, Shivam .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (11) :1175-1204
[10]  
Det Norske Veritas (Dnv GL, 2016, Recommended practice Det Norske Veritas DNVGL-ST-0126: support structures for wind turbines