Directional versus ring-mode deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: protocol of a multi-centre double-blind randomised crossover trial

被引:0
|
作者
Brinke, Timo R. ten [1 ,2 ]
Jergas, Hannah [3 ,4 ]
Sisodia, Vibuthi [1 ,2 ]
Barbe, Michael T. [3 ,4 ]
Odekerken, Vincent J. J. [1 ,2 ]
Verbaan, Dagmar [1 ,2 ]
Dijk, Joke M. [1 ,2 ]
Bot, Maarten [1 ,2 ]
Beudel, Martijn [1 ,2 ]
van den Munckhof, Pepijn [1 ,2 ]
Schuurman, P. Rick [1 ,2 ]
de Bie, Rob M. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Neurosci, Neurodegenerat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Parkinson's disease; Deep brain stimulation; Directional deep brain stimulation; Steering subthalamic nucleus; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; STEERING TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-023-03387-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy for Parkinson's disease can be limited by side-effects caused by electrical current spillover into structures adjacent to the target area. The objective of the STEEred versus RING-mode DBS for Parkinson's disease (STEERING) study is to investigate if directional DBS for Parkinson's disease results in a better clinical outcome when compared to ring-mode DBS.MethodsThe STEERING study is a prospective multi-centre double-blind randomised crossover trial. Inclusion criteria are Parkinson's disease, subthalamic nucleus DBS in a 'classic' ring-mode setting for a minimum of six months, and optimal ring-mode settings have been established. Participants are categorised into one of two subgroups according to their clinical response to the ring-mode settings as 'responders' (i.e., patient with a satisfactory effect of ring-mode DBS) or 'non-responder' (i.e., patient with a non-satisfactory effect of ring-mode DBS). A total of 64 responders and 38 non-responders will be included (total 102 patients). After an optimisation period in which an optimal directional setting is found, participants are randomised to first receive ring-mode DBS for 56 days (range 28-66) followed by directional DBS for 56 days (28-66) or vice-versa. The primary outcome is the difference between ring-mode DBS and directional DBS settings on the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Motor Evaluation (MDS-UPDRS-ME) in the off-medication state. Secondary outcome measures consist of MDS-UPDRS-ME in the on-medication state, MDS-UPDRS Activities of Daily Living, MDS-UPDRS Motor Complications-Dyskinesia, disease related quality of life measured with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39, stimulation-induced side-effects, antiparkinsonian medication use, and DBS-parameters. Participants' therapy preference is measured at the end of the study. Outcomes will be analysed for both responder and non-responder groups, as well as for both groups pooled together.DiscussionThe STEERING trial will provide insights into whether or not directional DBS should be standardly used in all Parkinson's disease DBS patients or if directional DBS should only be used in a case-based approach.Trial registrationThis trial was registered on the Netherlands Trial Register, as trial NL6508 (NTR6696) on June 23, 2017.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Directional versus ring-mode deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: protocol of a multi-centre double-blind randomised crossover trial
    Timo R. ten Brinke
    Hannah Jergas
    Vibuthi Sisodia
    Michael T. Barbe
    Vincent J. J. Odekerken
    Dagmar Verbaan
    Joke M. Dijk
    Maarten Bot
    Martijn Beudel
    Pepijn van den Munckhof
    P. Rick Schuurman
    Rob M. A. de Bie
    BMC Neurology, 23
  • [2] Directional Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Results of an International Crossover Study With Randomized, Double-Blind Primary Endpoint
    Schnitzler, Alfons
    Mir, Pablo
    Brodsky, Matthew A.
    Verhagen, Leonard
    Groppa, Sergiu
    Alvarez, Ramiro
    Evans, Andrew
    Blazquez, Marta
    Nagel, Sean
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    Poetter-Nerger, Monika
    Tse, Winona
    Almeida, Leonardo
    Tomycz, Nestor
    Jimenez-Shahed, Joohi
    Libionka, Witold
    Carrillo, Fatima
    Hartmann, Christian J.
    Groiss, Stefan Jun
    Glaser, Martin
    Defresne, Florence
    Karst, Edward
    Cheeran, Binith
    Vesper, Jan
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021,
  • [3] Effects of Unilateral Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial
    Zeng, Zhitong
    Wang, Linbin
    Shi, Weikun
    Xu, Lu
    Lin, Zhengyu
    Xu, Xinmeng
    Huang, Peng
    Pan, Yixin
    Chen, Zhonglue
    Ling, Yun
    Ren, Kang
    Zhang, Chencheng
    Sun, Bomin
    Li, Dianyou
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [4] Protocol of a randomised delayed-start double-blind placebo-controlled multi-centre trial for Levodopa in EArly Parkinson's disease: the LEAP-study
    Verschuur, Constant V. M.
    Suwijn, S. R.
    Post, B.
    Dijkgraaf, M.
    Bloem, B. R.
    van Hilten, J. J.
    van Laar, T.
    Tissingh, G.
    Deuschl, G.
    Lang, A. E.
    de Haan, R. J.
    de Bie, R. M. A.
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [5] Protocol of a randomised delayed-start double-blind placebo-controlled multi-centre trial for Levodopa in EArly Parkinson’s disease: the LEAP-study
    Constant V. M. Verschuur
    S. R. Suwijn
    B. Post
    M. Dijkgraaf
    B. R. Bloem
    J. J. van Hilten
    T. van Laar
    G. Tissingh
    G. Deuschl
    A. E. Lang
    R. J. de Haan
    R. M. A. de Bie
    BMC Neurology, 15
  • [6] A multicenter double-blind randomized crossover study comparing the impact of dorsal subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation versus standard care on apathy in Parkinson’s disease: a study protocol
    T. J. C. Zoon
    G. van Rooijen
    M. F. Contarino
    S. van der Gaag
    R. Zutt
    J. T. van Asseldonk
    P. van den Munckhof
    P. R. Schuurman
    D. A. J. P. Denys
    R. M. A. de Bie
    Trials, 25
  • [7] A multicenter double-blind randomized crossover study comparing the impact of dorsal subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation versus standard care on apathy in Parkinson's disease: a study protocol
    Zoon, T. J. C.
    van Rooijen, G.
    Contarino, M. F.
    van der Gaag, S.
    Zutt, R.
    van Asseldonk, J. T.
    van den Munckhof, P.
    Schuurman, P. R.
    Denys, D. A. J. P.
    de Bie, R. M. A.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [8] Dexmedetomidine after deep brain stimulation for prevention of delirium in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease: protocol for a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in China
    Yao, Jingxin
    Shen, Zhongyuan
    Jin, Hailong
    Ma, Tingting
    Wang, Jie
    Li, Shu
    Zeng, Min
    Liu, Xiaoyuan
    Peng, Yuming
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [9] Effect of Low versus High Frequency Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Speech Intelligibility and Verbal Fluency in Parkinson's Disease: A Double-Blind Study
    Grover, Timothy
    Georgiev, Dejan
    Kalliola, Rania
    Mahlknecht, Philipp
    Zacharia, Andre
    Candelario, Joseph
    Hyam, Jonathan
    Zrinzo, Ludvic
    Hariz, Marwan
    Foltynie, Thomas
    Limousin, Patricia
    Jahanshahi, Marjan
    Tripoliti, Elina
    JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE, 2019, 9 (01) : 141 - 151
  • [10] Unilateral Subthalamic Versus Unilateral Pallidal Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Study
    Zhang, C. C.
    Zeng, Z. T.
    Wang, L. B.
    Shi, W. K.
    Lin, Z. Y.
    Sun, B. M.
    Li, D. Y.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2021, 36 : S200 - S200