Clinical Outcome of Full Endoscopic Trans Kambin's Triangle Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Morimoto, Masatoshi [1 ]
Wada, Keizo [1 ]
Tamaki, Shunsuke [1 ]
Soeda, Saori [1 ]
Sugiura, Kosuke [1 ]
Manabe, Hiroaki [1 ]
Tezuka, Fumitake [1 ]
Yamashita, Kazuta [1 ]
Sairyo, Koichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ, Dept Orthoped, Tokushima, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Full endoscope; Kambin's triangle; KLIF; Lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive spinal surgery; TLIF; TECHNICAL NOTE; CASE SERIES; MIS-TLIF; COMPLICATIONS; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.026
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Full-endoscopic (FE) lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is now a widely used type of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although FE-LIF includes LIF with foraminoplasty via a Kambin's triangle approach (FE-KLIF) and LIF with foraminotomy via an interlaminar approach, these techniques are rarely discussed separately. This review evaluates the outcomes and complications of FE-KLIF reported in the literature. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of FE-KLIF. Of 464 publications assessed, 11 met our inclusion criteria. Although the most frequently treated level was L4/5, L5/S1 was also treated. FE-KLIF was performed under local anesthesia and sedation or under epidural anesthesia without general anesthesia. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were improved postoperatively in all uncontrolled studies; however, there was no significant difference in these scores in studies that compared FE-KLIF with posterior LIF (PLIF) or MIS-transforaminal LIF (TLIF). There was also no significant difference in the fusion rate between FE-KLIF and PLIF or MIS-TLIF. In terms of complications, although there were no reports of hematoma, dural tear and surgical site infection were reported in 1 paper each, with transient nerve disorders reported in 5 studies (frequency, 1.8%e23.5%). This review indicates that FE-KLIF is a feasible and viable surgical option for lumbar degenerative disease. However, the amount and level of evidence is low for the studies included in this review, and the data on long-term outcomes remain limited.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi Yu
    Hui gen Lu
    Xue kang Pan
    Zhong hai Shen
    Peng Ren
    Xu qi Hu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [32] Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion
    Gatann, Asrafi Rizki
    Gatam, Luthfi
    Mahadhipta, Harmantya
    Ajiantoro, Ajiantoro
    Luthfi, Omar
    Aprilya, Dina
    ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2021, 13 : 229 - 239
  • [33] Neuromonitoring in Lateral Approaches for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Zheng, Eileen
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : 268 - +
  • [34] Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Long, William W.
    DiBattista, Jacob V.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (10) : 1412 - 1419
  • [35] Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Zhao, Xiao-bing
    Ma, Hai-jun
    Geng, Bin
    Zhou, Hong-gang
    Xia, Ya-yi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (01) : 328 - 337
  • [36] Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Qi
    Lu, Hui Gen
    Pan, Xue Kang
    Shen, Zhong Hai
    Ren, Peng
    Hu, Xu Qi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [37] Clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates in endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sousa, Jose Miguel
    Ribeiro, Hugo
    Silva, Joao Luis
    Nogueira, Paulo
    Consciencia, Jose Guimaraes
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [38] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gun Keorochana
    Kitipong Setrkraising
    Patarawan Woratanarat
    Alisara Arirachakaran
    Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
    Neurosurgical Review, 2018, 41 : 755 - 770
  • [39] Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Dual-channel Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Scoliosis
    You, Xuanjun
    Zhao, Bin
    Zhang, Tao
    Wang, Yongfeng
    Xu, Chaojian
    Yuan, Jie
    Liu, Ruxing
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (05) : 1134 - 1142
  • [40] Learning Curve and Initial Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Tan, Renchun
    Lv, Xin
    Wu, Pengfei
    Li, Yawei
    Dai, Yuliang
    Jiang, Bin
    Ren, Bolin
    Lv, Guohua
    Wang, Bing
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9