Clinical Outcome of Full Endoscopic Trans Kambin's Triangle Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Morimoto, Masatoshi [1 ]
Wada, Keizo [1 ]
Tamaki, Shunsuke [1 ]
Soeda, Saori [1 ]
Sugiura, Kosuke [1 ]
Manabe, Hiroaki [1 ]
Tezuka, Fumitake [1 ]
Yamashita, Kazuta [1 ]
Sairyo, Koichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ, Dept Orthoped, Tokushima, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Full endoscope; Kambin's triangle; KLIF; Lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive spinal surgery; TLIF; TECHNICAL NOTE; CASE SERIES; MIS-TLIF; COMPLICATIONS; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.026
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Full-endoscopic (FE) lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is now a widely used type of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although FE-LIF includes LIF with foraminoplasty via a Kambin's triangle approach (FE-KLIF) and LIF with foraminotomy via an interlaminar approach, these techniques are rarely discussed separately. This review evaluates the outcomes and complications of FE-KLIF reported in the literature. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of FE-KLIF. Of 464 publications assessed, 11 met our inclusion criteria. Although the most frequently treated level was L4/5, L5/S1 was also treated. FE-KLIF was performed under local anesthesia and sedation or under epidural anesthesia without general anesthesia. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were improved postoperatively in all uncontrolled studies; however, there was no significant difference in these scores in studies that compared FE-KLIF with posterior LIF (PLIF) or MIS-transforaminal LIF (TLIF). There was also no significant difference in the fusion rate between FE-KLIF and PLIF or MIS-TLIF. In terms of complications, although there were no reports of hematoma, dural tear and surgical site infection were reported in 1 paper each, with transient nerve disorders reported in 5 studies (frequency, 1.8%e23.5%). This review indicates that FE-KLIF is a feasible and viable surgical option for lumbar degenerative disease. However, the amount and level of evidence is low for the studies included in this review, and the data on long-term outcomes remain limited.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Kunder, Suzanne L.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Rijkers, Kim
    Caelers, Inge J. M. H.
    van Hemert, Wouter L. W.
    de Bie, Rob A.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (11) : 1712 - 1721
  • [22] Optimizing Disc and Cartilage Endplate Preparation in Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An In-Depth Exploration of Surgical Instruments with a Technique Note and Narrative Review
    Chien, Kai-Ting
    Feng, Hsiang-Wei
    Chang, Ting-Kuo
    Liu, Yueh-Ching
    Chen, Lei -Po
    Huang, Yu-Ching
    Lian, Yan-Shiang
    Li, Jian-You
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 189 : 228 - 247
  • [23] Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Hao
    Song, Yifan
    Li, Yiming
    Zhou, Hengcai
    Fu, Yufei
    Li, Jie
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [24] Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    You, Ki-Han
    Hyun, Jin-Tak
    Park, Sang-Min
    Kang, Min-Seok
    Cho, Samuel K.
    Park, Hyun-Jin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [25] Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haibier, Abuduwupuer
    Yusufu, Alimujiang
    Hang, Lin
    Abudurexiti, Tuerhongjiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [26] The History of and Controversy over Kambin's Triangle: A Historical Analysis of the Lumbar Transforaminal Corridor for Endoscopic and Surgical Approaches
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    Madhavan, Karthik
    Godzik, Jakub
    Wang, Michael Y.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 123 : 402 - 408
  • [27] The Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review, and Future Perspective
    Pholprajug, Phattareeya
    Kotheeranurak, Vit
    Liu, Yanting
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (04) : 1224 - 1245
  • [28] Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lan, Tao
    Hu, Shi-Yu
    Zhang, Yuan-Tao
    Zheng, Yu-Chen
    Zhang, Rui
    Shen, Zhe
    Yang, Xin-Jian
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 : 86 - 93
  • [29] Endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: a contrastive review
    Yuan, Chao
    Wang, Jian
    Zhou, Yue
    Pan, Yong
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (04) : 429 - 434
  • [30] Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review
    Yu, Yihang
    Robinson, Dale L.
    Ackland, David C.
    Yang, Yi
    Lee, Peter Vee Sin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)