Agricultural intensity interacts with landscape arrangement in driving ecosystem services

被引:21
作者
Gebhardt, Swantje [1 ]
Van Dijk, Jerry [1 ]
Wassen, Martin J. [1 ]
Bakker, Martha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Environm Sci, Princetonlaan 8a, POB 80115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Environm Sci, Landscape Architecture & Spatial Planning Grp, Gebouw 101 ESG-LSP, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Agricultural intensity; Ecosystem service; Spatial configuration; Scale; LAND-USE INTENSITY; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; MULTIFUNCTIONALITY; CONFIGURATION; COMPLEXITY; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2023.108692
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Agricultural intensification has enhanced productivity but also led to enormous ecosystem service and biodiversity losses. Strategic spatial landscape design could counteract this trend, but, the scientific understanding of how ecosystem services respond to agricultural practices on one hand and land use composition and configuration on the other is not complete. This study aims to methodically explore how the effect of landscape layout settings on ecosystem services depends on the intensity of agricultural practices in their surroundings. Using the Netherlands as a case study, we used spatial regression models to analyze how agricultural management intensity affects the relationship between spatial composition and configuration metrics and ecosystem service indicators. We found that the effect of large shares of agricultural land use on species richness, pollination and landscape appreciation was increasingly negative with amplified intensity of agricultural practices. With higher agricultural intensity in the surroundings, the positive effects of well-connected natural vegetation on species richness were impaired. In contrast, the negative effects of high-intensity agriculture on pollination service were be buffered well through high shares of natural grassland vegetation. Water-quality related indicators were less affected by variation in spatial metrics and agricultural intensity. The main interactions between agricultural intensity and the spatial metrics were robust at varying scales. Our analysis suggests that both low-and high-intensity agriculture can have a place in future sustainable agricultural systems, provided they are integrated in the appropriate spatial layout. Explicitly addressing farming practices in connection to local spatial settings can improve both landscape planning and ecosystem service modelling.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition [J].
Allan, Eric ;
Manning, Pete ;
Alt, Fabian ;
Binkenstein, Julia ;
Blaser, Stefan ;
Bluethgen, Nico ;
Boehm, Stefan ;
Grassein, Fabrice ;
Hoelzel, Norbert ;
Klaus, Valentin H. ;
Kleinebecker, Till ;
Morris, E. Kathryn ;
Oelmann, Yvonne ;
Prati, Daniel ;
Renner, Swen C. ;
Rillig, Matthias C. ;
Schaefer, Martin ;
Schloter, Michael ;
Schmitt, Barbara ;
Schoening, Ingo ;
Schrumpf, Marion ;
Solly, Emily ;
Sorkau, Elisabeth ;
Steckel, Juliane ;
Steffen-Dewenter, Ingolf ;
Stempfhuber, Barbara ;
Tschapka, Marco ;
Weiner, Christiane N. ;
Weisser, Wolfgang W. ;
Werner, Michael ;
Westphal, Catrin ;
Wilcke, Wolfgang ;
Fischer, Markus .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 18 (08) :834-843
[2]  
Atlas Natuurlijk Kapitaal, 2017, Soortendiversiteit van Nederland
[3]   Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats [J].
Blitzer, Eleanor J. ;
Dormann, Carsten F. ;
Holzschuh, Andrea ;
Klein, Alexandra-Maria ;
Rand, Tatyana A. ;
Tscharntke, Teja .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 146 (01) :34-43
[4]   AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons [J].
Burnham, Kenneth P. ;
Anderson, David R. ;
Huyvaert, Kathryn P. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2011, 65 (01) :23-35
[5]  
CBS, 2022, About us
[6]   Landscape diversity and forest edge density regulate stream water quality in agricultural catchments [J].
Clement, Francis ;
Ruiz, Julie ;
Rodriguez, Marco A. ;
Blais, Daniel ;
Campeau, Stephane .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 72 :627-639
[7]   Landscape complexity and farmland biodiversity: Evaluating the CAP target on natural elements [J].
Cormont, A. ;
Siepel, H. ;
Clement, J. ;
Melman, T. C. P. ;
WallisDeVries, M. F. ;
van Turnhout, C. A. M. ;
Sparrius, L. B. ;
Reemer, M. ;
Biesmeijer, J. C. ;
Berendse, F. ;
de Snoo, G. R. .
JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2016, 30 :19-26
[8]   A user-inspired framework and tool for restoring multifunctional landscapes: putting into practice stakeholder and scientific knowledge of landscape services [J].
Duarte, Gabriela Teixeira ;
Mitchell, Matthew ;
Martello, Felipe ;
Gregr, Edward J. ;
Paglia, Adriano Pereira ;
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Ribeiro, Milton Cezar .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2020, 35 (11) :2535-2548
[9]   The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: meta-analyses of landscape services [J].
Duarte, Gabriela Teixeira ;
Santos, Paloma Marques ;
Cornelissen, Tatiana Garabini ;
Ribeiro, Milton Cezar ;
Paglia, Adriano Pereira .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2018, 33 (08) :1247-1257
[10]   Winners and losers of national and global efforts to reconcile agricultural intensification and biodiversity conservation [J].
Egli, Lukas ;
Meyer, Carsten ;
Scherber, Christoph ;
Kreft, Holger ;
Tscharntke, Teja .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (05) :2212-2228